Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
England and Wales decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The Upper Tribunal upheld findings that housing liabilities were contrived to take advantage of the housing benefit scheme, finding no material error of law.
The Court of Appeal held that subsidy and landlord funding were irrelevant to the rent comparison under regulation 13(3)(b) of the Housing Benefit Regulations 2006.
Birmingham City Council v SS & Ors [2016] EWCA Civ 1211 (30 November 2016)
Court of Appeal held that regulation 13(3)(b) requires a direct rent comparison for housing benefit without adjusting for the landlord’s subsidy or finances.
S, R (on the application of) v A Social Security Commissioner & Ors [2009] EWHC 2221 (Admin) (03 September 2009)
The High Court held that Lifeways was not providing care and support on Rivendell’s behalf, so the claimant’s supported housing was not exempt accommodation.
The High Court held that supported housing at Victoria Avenue was not “exempt accommodation” because Lifeways did not provide care on Rivendell’s behalf.
S, R (on the application of) v Social Security Commissioner & Ors [2008] EWHC 3097 (Admin) (19 December 2008)
The High Court granted permission for judicial review of a Social Security Commissioner's refusal to appeal, finding it arguable that the meaning of "on behalf of" was wrongly interpreted.
The High Court granted permission to seek judicial review of a Social Security Commissioner’s refusal of permission to appeal about the meaning of “on behalf of” in housing benefit rules.
Explore more
