Thomas Mark Roberts v The Information Commissioner
The requests, though initially of value, had by the time of the FOI requests lost serious purpose and imposed a disproportionate burden on the small public authority, especially given that the issues had already been addressed by auditors and Audit Wales. The cumulative effect of persistent, repetitive requests and prior dealings justified the authority's reliance on section 14(1) FOIA to refuse them as vexatious.
Source excerpt
- Freedom of information
- Vexatious requests
- Public authority accountability