Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
England and Wales decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The application to hear the CPR Part 18 request was refused because it would be unfair and unjust to proceed with insufficient notice to JCB, despite the application's apparent simplicity and prior awareness.
Source excerpt
Given the prima facie evidence of asset dealings and the lack of substantive opposition or compliance by the Defendants, the court finds it appropriate and proportionate to order disclosure of relevant bank statements and provision of further information, subject to privacy and privilege safeguards.
Source excerpt
The Owners of the "Christos Theo" v The Owners of the "Aliki" [2024] EWHC 2106 (Admlty) (06 June 2024)
In an admiralty collision claim, the court ordered extensive specific disclosure, approved the expert question on engine malfunction, and refused further information.
The defendants demonstrated a prima facie case of engine malfunction and incomplete disclosure by the claimants. The documents sought are relevant to the core issues and must be disclosed or a disclosure statement provided. The expert issue should be framed as proposed by the defendants. The claimants' application for further information is refused as unnecessary and argumentative.
Source excerpt
Fairclough v Tosi Ltd & Anor [2022] EWHC 2714 (Ch) (27 October 2022)
The High Court ordered a respondent in an unfair prejudice petition to answer specific Part 18 requests for further information, finding the material was needed now.
The State of Qatar v Banque Havilland SA & Ors [2020] EWHC 1248 (Comm) (05 March 2020)
Commercial Court application on further information and disclosure. Most requests were refused, but limited particulars were ordered on the presentation and roles of others.
Peak Hotels And Resorts Limited v Tarek Investments Limited & Ors [2016] EWHC 333 (Ch) (12 February 2016)
Interlocutory Chancery rulings on disclosure, privilege, further information, and costs, with limited orders made and costs summarily assessed.
Interlocutory rulings on disclosure, further information, security for costs, and costs. The court granted some relief, limited disclosure, and reduced costs.
The Court of Appeal held that Regulation 1206/2001 did not require use of cross-border evidence procedures for ordinary disclosure or further information requests.
Vava & Ors v Anglo American South Africa Ltd [2012] EWHC 1969 (QB) (16 July 2012)
Interlocutory ruling on jurisdiction: the claimants had an arguable case that AASA’s central administration was in England, but further information was refused.
Explore more
