Sign in
England and Wales Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

England and Wales Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
0 court collections
Last checked

England and Wales decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Administrative law [2025] EWHC 2015 (Admin)

Evans & Anor, R (On the Application Of) v Care Quality Commission

Evans & Anor, R (On the Application Of) v Care Quality Commission [2025] EWHC 2015 (Admin) (31 July 2025)

Judicial review of the CQC’s registration and assessment of a private gender clinic failed. The court found the regulator’s decisions were rational and lawful.

  • Judicial review of regulatory decisions
  • Healthcare regulation
  • Gender dysphoria treatment
  • Irrationality (wednesbury unreasonableness)
  • Statutory interpretation
  • Process and outcome rationality
Read case analysis
Administrative law [2025] EWHC 1 (Admin)

Cygnet Health Care Ltd, R (On the Application Of) v Care Quality Commission

Cygnet Health Care Ltd, R (On the Application Of) v Care Quality Commission [2025] EWHC 1 (Admin) (21 January 2025)

The Administrative Court considered whether CQC inspection and enforcement decisions involving an inspector who had previously been a Cygnet patient were tainted by apparent bias.

  • Apparent bias
  • Conflicts of interest
  • Judicial review of regulatory decisions
  • Healthcare regulation
  • Procedural fairness
  • Apparent-bias
Read case analysis
Administrative law

Transactual CIC & Anor, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Health and Social Care & Anor

The Secretary of State's decision to use the emergency procedure under section 62(3) Medicines Act 1968 was rational and lawful given the Cass Review's findings of substantial risks and limited benefits of puberty blockers, the lack of regulatory control over overseas prescribing, and the need to act urgently to avoid serious danger to health. The absence of consultation was lawful under the statutory scheme, and no additional common law or Article 8 ECHR procedural duty arose. The claim for judicial review is dismissed on all grounds.

  • Emergency legislation
  • Consultation requirements
  • Precautionary principle
  • Article 8 echr
  • Judicial review of ministerial decisions
  • Healthcare regulation
Read case analysis
Competition law [2023] EWCA Civ 763

The Secretary of State for Health & Anor v Servier Laboratories Ltd & Ors

The Secretary of State for Health & Anor v Servier Laboratories Ltd & Ors [2023] EWCA Civ 763 (03 July 2023)

The Court of Appeal upheld the dismissal of Servier’s appeal, holding that the mitigation defence over perindopril did not require further disclosure from all PCTs or Health Boards.

  • Abuse of dominance
  • Anti-competitive agreements
  • Mitigation of loss
  • Disclosure
  • Damages
  • Healthcare regulation
Read case analysis
Administrative law [2022] EWHC 2943 (Admin)

Hexpress Healthcare Ltd, R (On the Application Of) v Care Quality Commission

Hexpress Healthcare Ltd, R (On the Application Of) v Care Quality Commission [2022] EWHC 2943 (Admin) (25 November 2022)

The High Court granted permission for judicial review only on the argument that the CQC’s conclusions may have been based on a statistically insignificant sample.

  • Judicial review
  • Procedural fairness
  • Statutory interpretation
  • Healthcare regulation
  • Injunctions
  • Judicial-review
Read case analysis
Administrative law [2022] EWHC 1141 (Admin)

Taggart v The Royal College of Surgeons of England & Anor

Taggart v The Royal College of Surgeons of England & Anor [2022] EWHC 1141 (Admin) (13 May 2022)

The High Court held that the Royal College of Surgeons’ Invited Review Mechanism was not amenable to judicial review and dismissed the claim.

  • Amenability to judicial review
  • Public function test
  • Healthcare regulation
  • Employment disputes
  • Procedural fairness
  • Amenability-to-judicial-review
Read case analysis
Administrative law

R (Professor Paul Taggart) v The Royal College of Surgeons of England

The High Court held that the Royal College of Surgeons’ Invited Review Mechanism is not amenable to judicial review because it is contractual, advisory, and lacks sufficient public character.

  • Amenability to judicial review
  • Public vs private functions
  • Healthcare regulation
  • Procedural fairness
  • Amenability-to-judicial-review
  • Public-vs-private-functions
Read case analysis
Competition law [2022] EWHC 369 (Ch)

The Secretary of State for Health & Anor v Servier Laboratories Ltd & Ors

The Secretary of State for Health & Anor v Servier Laboratories Ltd & Ors [2022] EWHC 369 (Ch) (21 February 2022)

Preliminary issues in Servier perindopril damages claims; the court rejected the argument that health authorities should have promoted switching to cheaper ACE inhibitors.

  • Abuse of dominance
  • Anti-competitive agreements
  • Damages
  • Mitigation of loss
  • Causation
  • Remoteness
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

England and Wales decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.