Sign in
England and Wales Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

England and Wales Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
0 court collections
Last checked

England and Wales decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Criminal law [2025] EWHC 3349 (Admin)

Mirza v Crown Prosecution Service

Mirza v Crown Prosecution Service [2025] EWHC 3349 (Admin) (19 December 2025)

The High Court dismissed Zahid Mirza’s application for a certificate of inadequacy under s.83 Criminal Justice Act 1988, finding no proof of a genuine post-order change in assets.

  • Confiscation orders
  • Certificate of inadequacy
  • Realisable assets
  • Hidden assets
  • Criminal benefit
  • Enforcement of confiscation orders
Read case analysis
Criminal law

Zahid Mirza v Crown Prosecution Service

The High Court dismissed Mr Mirza’s s.83 Criminal Justice Act 1988 application for a certificate of inadequacy, finding he was trying to re-open the original confiscation order.

  • Certificate of inadequacy
  • Confiscation order enforcement
  • Hidden assets
  • Change of financial circumstances
  • Certificate-of-inadequacy
  • Confiscation-orders
Read case analysis
Criminal law

Jason Butler v R

The appellant actively consented to the confiscation order, instructed his lawyers to seek it, and was aware of the questionable value of the assets included. The circumstances do not amount to the most exceptional required to set aside a consent order. The appeal is dismissed.

  • Confiscation orders
  • Consent orders
  • Jurisdiction
  • Fresh evidence
  • Hidden assets
Read case analysis
Criminal law [2025] EWCA Crim 1

Butler v R. (Rev1)

Butler v R. (Rev1) [2025] EWCA Crim 1 (13 January 2025)

Appeal against a consent confiscation order dismissed. The court held the appellant knowingly agreed figures he knew were unsustainable and no exceptional unfairness was shown.

  • Confiscation orders
  • Consent orders
  • Default prison sentences
  • Hidden assets
  • Jurisdiction to vary orders
  • Exceptional circumstances in appeals
Read case analysis
Criminal law

Pradip Daya (aka Pradip Chavda) v Crown Prosecution Service

The applicant failed to discharge the burden of proof under section 83 of the Criminal Justice Act 1988 because he provided no evidence as to what became of the hidden assets found by the Crown Court, nor any evidence that those assets had depreciated or were no longer available. The statutory regime does not permit the court to grant a Certificate of Inadequacy based solely on proportionality or hardship where the applicant has not engaged with the requirement to account for the hidden assets. Accordingly, the application must be dismissed.

  • Confiscation orders
  • Certificate of inadequacy
  • Hidden assets
  • Burden of proof
  • Interest on confiscation orders
  • Proportionality
Read case analysis
Criminal law [2024] EWHC 2177 (Admin)

Pigott v Crown Prosecution Service

Pigott v Crown Prosecution Service [2024] EWHC 2177 (Admin) (20 August 2024)

The High Court refused Stephen Pigott’s application for a certificate of inadequacy under section 83 of the Criminal Justice Act 1988, finding he had not proved asset dissipation.

  • Confiscation order
  • Certificate of inadequacy
  • Hidden assets
  • Abuse of process
  • Res judicata
  • Burden of proof
Read case analysis
Criminal law

Stephen Pigott v Crown Prosecution Service

The High Court refused Stephen Pigott’s application for a certificate of inadequacy under section 83 of the Criminal Justice Act 1988, finding he had not proved his assets were insufficient.

  • Confiscation orders
  • Certificates of inadequacy
  • Abuse of process
  • Hidden assets
  • Certificate-of-inadequacy
  • Confiscation-orders
Read case analysis
Criminal law [2024] EWHC 1091 (Admin)

Daya v Crown Prosecution Service

Daya v Crown Prosecution Service [2024] EWHC 1091 (Admin) (08 May 2024)

The High Court refused a certificate of inadequacy in a confiscation case, holding that the applicant failed to explain what happened to hidden assets or show a change in circumstances.

  • Confiscation orders
  • Certificate of inadequacy
  • Hidden assets
  • Burden of proof
  • Interest on confiscation orders
  • Certificate-of-inadequacy
Read case analysis
Criminal law

R v Puvinder Singh Briah

The Court of Appeal partly allowed an appeal against a confiscation order, deducting HMRC cheque payments of £42,675.34 but rejecting a double-counting challenge.

  • Confiscation order
  • Money laundering
  • Conspiracy
  • Hidden assets
  • Double counting
  • Fresh evidence
Read case analysis
Criminal law [2022] EWCA Crim 1818

Briah, R. v

Briah, R. v [2022] EWCA Crim 1818 (02 December 2022)

The Court of Appeal partly allowed a confiscation-order appeal after fresh evidence showed HMRC cheque payments totalling £42,675.34 should be deducted.

  • Money laundering
  • Confiscation orders
  • Double counting
  • Hidden assets
  • Appeal procedure
  • Confiscation-orders
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

England and Wales decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.