S v London Borough of Islington (Application to Prevent Vaccination)
The mother's application was dismissed because she provided no cogent, objective medical or welfare evidence demonstrating a genuine contraindication to vaccination. The local authority's decision to vaccinate P was not unreasonable, irrational, disproportionate, unlawful, or in breach of Article 8 ECHR. The risks of not vaccinating P outweigh the mother's asserted parental rights and concerns, and the established medical evidence supports routine vaccination as being in the best interests of children.
Source excerpt
- Vaccination of children
- Parental responsibility
- Interim care orders
- Human rights (article 8 echr)