Sign in
England and Wales Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

England and Wales Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
0 court collections
Last checked

England and Wales decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Professional discipline [2025] EWHC 899 (Admin)

General Medical Council v Shah

General Medical Council v Shah [2025] EWHC 899 (Admin) (11 April 2025)

The High Court dismissed the GMC’s appeal against a 12-month suspension of Dr Shah, holding the tribunal’s findings, risk assessment, and sanction were reasonable.

  • Medical misconduct
  • Sexual harassment
  • Sanctions in professional regulation
  • Equality act 2010
  • Fitness to practise
  • Medical-misconduct
Read case analysis
Administrative law [2025] EWHC 318 (Admin)

Professional Standards Authority for Health and Social Care v General Medical Council & Anor

Professional Standards Authority for Health and Social Care v General Medical Council & Anor [2025] EWHC 318 (Admin) (14 February 2025)

The High Court allowed the Authority’s statutory appeal, quashed a GMC tribunal decision, and remitted the case after finding errors in the cross-admissibility directions.

  • Cross-admissibility of evidence
  • Fitness to practise
  • Medical misconduct
  • Statutory appeals
  • Tribunal procedure
  • Professional-discipline
Read case analysis
Administrative law [2025] EWHC 247 (Admin)

Demanya v The General Medical Council

Demanya v The General Medical Council [2025] EWHC 247 (Admin) (07 February 2025)

High Court appeal against GMC erasure dismissed. The court upheld findings that the doctor failed to diagnose sepsis, falsified records, and lied to the coroner.

  • Fitness to practise
  • Dishonesty in professional conduct
  • Medical misconduct
  • Sanctions in professional regulation
  • Appellate review
  • Standard of proof in disciplinary proceedings
Read case analysis
Professional discipline

General Medical Council v Nour Mohamed Magdy Aly Rezk

The Tribunal's decision to take no action was wrong because it failed to adequately consider the seriousness of the misconduct, the aggravating factors, and the need to maintain public confidence and professional standards. The circumstances relied upon as exceptional were not unusual, special, or uncommon, and did not justify taking no action. The appropriate sanction is the imposition of conditions on Dr Rezk's registration for 12 months to address his shortcomings and protect the public.

  • Medical misconduct
  • Sexual harassment
  • Sanctions in professional regulation
  • Appeals procedure
  • Public confidence in professions
Read case analysis
Administrative law

The Professional Standard Authority for Health and Social Care v General Medical Council & Anor.

The Tribunal’s decision on sanction was vitiated by a serious procedural error: its reasoning was inadequate and unclear, failing to address central issues including the seriousness of the misconduct, aggravating factors, the registrant’s lack of insight and remediation, and the reasons for departing from the Sanctions Guidance. This prevented the appellate court from determining whether the sanction was sufficient for public protection. The decision was quashed and remitted for reconsideration.

  • Sanctions in professional discipline
  • Procedural fairness
  • Adequacy of reasons
  • Medical misconduct
  • Remediation and insight
  • Public protection
Read case analysis
Professional discipline

Mohammad Adil v General Medical Council

The High Court dismissed Dr Adil’s appeal against GMC disciplinary findings arising from COVID-19 conspiracy videos, upholding misconduct, impairment, and a six-month suspension.

  • Medical misconduct
  • Fitness to practise
  • Freedom of expression
  • Echr article 10
  • Social media conduct
  • Medical-misconduct
Read case analysis
Professional regulation [2021] EWHC 588 (Admin)

Professional Standards Authority for Health and Social Care v General Medical Council & Anor

Professional Standards Authority for Health and Social Care v General Medical Council & Anor [2021] EWHC 588 (Admin) (12 March 2021)

The High Court allowed an appeal by the Professional Standards Authority and replaced a 10-month suspension with erasure for a doctor’s serious sexual misconduct.

  • Medical misconduct
  • Sexual harassment
  • Sanctions in professional discipline
  • Fitness to practise
  • Medical-misconduct
  • Sexual-harassment
Read case analysis
Criminal law [2017] EWCA Crim 1625

Paterson, R. v

Paterson, R. v [2017] EWCA Crim 1625 (03 August 2017)

The Court of Appeal found Ian Paterson’s 15-year sentence for multiple wounding convictions unduly lenient and increased the section 18 sentences to 20 years.

  • Sentencing
  • Wounding with intent
  • Abuse of trust
  • Medical misconduct
  • Unduly lenient sentence
  • Wounding-with-intent
Read case analysis
Administrative law [2017] EWHC 1247 (Admin)

General Medical Council v Jagjivan & Anor

General Medical Council v Jagjivan & Anor [2017] EWHC 1247 (Admin) (26 May 2017)

The High Court held the GMC could appeal under section 40A and found the tribunal was wrong to reject sexual motivation in Dr Jagjivan’s conduct.

  • Medical misconduct
  • Fitness to practise
  • Statutory interpretation
  • Sexual motivation in professional conduct
  • Jurisdiction of regulatory appeals
  • Medical-misconduct
Read case analysis
Administrative law [2013] EWHC 3116 (Admin)

General Medical Council v Goslakkal

General Medical Council v Goslakkal [2013] EWHC 3116 (Admin) (05 September 2013)

The High Court extended an interim suspension of a consultant paediatric neurologist pending a Fitness to Practise hearing, citing serious patient-safety concerns and expert evidence.

  • Interim suspension
  • Fitness to practise
  • Medical misconduct
  • Extension of suspension
  • Interim-suspension
  • Fitness-to-practise
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

England and Wales decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.