Sign in
England and Wales Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

England and Wales Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
0 court collections
Last checked

England and Wales decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Intellectual property

Dr Reddy’s Laboratories (UK) Limited v Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH

Damages would not be an adequate remedy for either party due to market unpredictability, risk of further generic entry, and inability to quantify harm. Preservation of the status quo and DR's failure to clear the way for its generic launch justify granting the interim injunction sought by BI.

  • Patent validity
  • Interim injunctions
  • Spc protection
  • Market exclusivity
  • Generic entry
  • Pharmaceutical pricing
Read case analysis
Intellectual property law

Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Limited & Anor v Astellas Pharma Inc

The patent was not obvious over AU288 and common general knowledge because it was not obvious to try mirabegron for OAB with a reasonable expectation of success; the prior art did not provide sufficient data or rationale for selecting mirabegron for OAB, and the patent made a technical contribution by teaching its use for OAB with supporting experimental evidence.

  • Obviousness
  • Patent infringement
  • Supplementary protection certificate
  • Medical use claims
Read case analysis
Intellectual property law [2023] EWCA Civ 880

Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd & Anor v Astellas Pharma Inc

Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd & Anor v Astellas Pharma Inc [2023] EWCA Civ 880 (25 July 2023)

The Court of Appeal dismissed an obviousness challenge to Astellas’s mirabegron patent, holding that AU288 and common general knowledge did not make the OAB use obvious.

  • Obviousness
  • Pharmaceutical patents
  • Medical use claims
  • Common general knowledge
  • Technical contribution
  • Patent-obviousness
Read case analysis
Intellectual property

Akebia Therapeutics Inc v Fibrogen, Inc

Patent trial concerning HIF-PHI medicines for anaemia, with challenges to validity, amendment and infringement of FibroGen’s patent families.

  • Patent validity
  • Patent infringement
  • Obviousness
  • Insufficiency
  • Indirect infringement
  • Medical use claims
Read case analysis
Intellectual property

Merz Pharma GmbH & Co. KGaA v Allergan Inc.

Patent revocation claim concerning botulinum toxin use for pain. The High Court held the claims invalid for added matter, lack of novelty, and obviousness.

  • Patent validity
  • Added matter
  • Novelty
  • Obviousness
  • Insufficiency
  • Swiss claims
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

England and Wales decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.