Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
England and Wales decisions
Decisions matching the current search
Toon, R. v [2026] EWCA Crim 622 (06 May 2026)
The Court of Appeal reduced and suspended Samuel Toon’s sentence for affray, finding the judge had not properly reflected mitigation or guilty plea credit.
The Court of Appeal upheld a 30-month sentence for conspiracy to convey Spice into prison, holding it was not manifestly excessive despite strong personal mitigation.
Sallis, R. v [2026] EWCA Crim 600 (30 April 2026)
The Court of Appeal dismissed an appeal against a 30-month sentence for conspiracy to convey Spice into prison, holding the term was not manifestly excessive.
The Court of Appeal reduced Conrad Byrd’s sentence for possessing cocaine with intent to supply from 12 years 9 months to 12 years after finding the original allowance for mitigation too low.
Oluwasina, R. v [2026] EWCA Crim 594 (24 April 2026)
The Court of Appeal reduced a youth robbery sentence from 46 to 36 months, holding the original sentence was excessive and that age at sentencing should not increase punishment.
Byrd, R. v [2026] EWCA Crim 586 (24 April 2026)
Court of Appeal reduced a drug-trafficking sentence from 12 years 9 months to 12 years after finding the original term still failed to reflect significant mitigation.
The Court of Appeal upheld Daniel Williamson’s seven-year-and-four-month sentence for a sustained blackmail campaign, though it corrected the guideline categorisation to B2.
The Court of Appeal dismissed Thomas Hoe’s appeal against a 15-year sentence for wounding with intent and possession of a bladed article.
Hoe, R. v [2026] EWCA Crim 554 (16 April 2026)
The Court of Appeal dismissed Thomas Hoe’s sentence appeal, holding that 15 years’ imprisonment for two section 18 wounding offences was not manifestly excessive.
Saheed v R. [2026] EWCA Crim 464 (16 April 2026)
The Court of Appeal dismissed a sentence appeal arising from two overlapping class A drug conspiracies, holding the judge could assess the evidence holistically and the term was not excessive.
Explore more
