Brooke Homes (Bicester Ltd) v Portfolio Property Partners Ltd & Ors
Brooke Homes (Bicester Ltd) v Portfolio Property Partners Ltd & Ors [2025] EWHC 1305 (Ch) (27 May 2025)
The High Court held that Desiman must account for a £2.4 million non-monetary benefit from a Spine Road extension, but rejected Brooke’s £2 million price-chip surcharge.
- Equitable account
- Doctrine of marshalling
- Mortgagee's duties
- Non-monetary consideration
- Wilful default
- Secured creditor priorities