Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
England and Wales decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The Court of Appeal dismissed the BMA’s challenge to GMC guidance using “medical professionals” for doctors, physician associates and anaesthesia associates.
The High Court dismissed PJSC VTB Bank’s judicial review of OFSI’s amended sanctions licence affecting VTB Capital’s insolvency and creditor distributions.
The Court of Appeal held that the Home Secretary’s gradual roll-out of eVisas for section 3C leave was not Wednesbury-unreasonable and dismissed the Padfield cross-appeal.
Refugee and Migrant Forum of Essex and London & Anor, R (On the Application Of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2025] EWCA Civ 1843 (19 November 2025)
The Court of Appeal held that the Home Office’s gradual rollout of eVisas for section 3C leave was not Wednesbury-unreasonable and allowed the appeal.
The High Court dismissed Coventry City Council’s judicial review over asylum accommodation in the city, rejecting claims based on legitimate expectation, policy, Padfield, equality duty, and irrationality.
The duty to consult under section 27(3) Children and Families Act 2014 is not triggered by entering SVAs; local authorities have discretion subject to rationality. The Public Sector Equality Duty was discharged at the appropriate stage given the high-level nature of the SVA decision. Devon County Council did not act irrationally or fail to make reasonable inquiries before entering the SVA. Entering the SVA did not frustrate the legislative purpose of Part 3 of the 2014 Act. No secret policy was operated.
Source excerpt
Judicial review of CQC decisions about Gender Plus Healthcare Ltd’s registration and rating for hormone treatment to 16–17 year olds. Claim dismissed.
Khan v Secretary of State for Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Affairs [2025] EWCA Civ 41 (24 January 2025)
Court of Appeal dismissed a sanctions challenge by Anzhelika Khan, upholding her designation under the Russia sanctions regime and rejecting human rights and Padfield arguments.
The Upper Tribunal held UBS’s judicial review was not academic, found limited misdirections in HMRC’s November 2022 decision, and ordered reconsideration of the s684(7A) discretion.
Judicial review over digital proof for section 3C leave holders, addressing hardship, compliant environment checks, PSED, and section 55 child welfare duties.
Explore more
