Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
England and Wales decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The High Court refused the Charity Commission’s judicial review challenge to an Ombudsman decision, holding the claim academic and, in any event, unarguable.
Lowe, R (On the Application Of) v Independent Complaints and Grievance Scheme [2026] EWHC 1163 (Admin) (14 May 2026)
The High Court held that a judicial review challenge to an ICGS investigation into an MP’s conduct was barred by Parliamentary privilege and not justiciable.
The High Court held that a judicial review of an ICGS investigation into an MP was barred by Parliamentary privilege and not justiciable.
Martin & Ors, R (On the Application Of) v Chancellor of the Exchequer & Anor [2026] EWHC 1123 (Admin) (12 May 2026)
The High Court refused permission for judicial review of a limited tax consultation on APR and BPR reforms, finding no legal duty to consult, the claim out of time, and the matter non-justiciable.
The Divisional Court refused permission for judicial review of a limited tax consultation on APR and BPR reforms, finding no legitimate expectation, delay, and parliamentary privilege.
Charity Commission for England and Wales v Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman [2026] EWHC 486 (Admin) (06 March 2026)
Permission for judicial review was refused because the claim had become academic, was unarguable, and was reinforced by parliamentary non-justiciability concerns.
The application for interim relief is refused because, even assuming there is a serious question to be tried regarding Parliamentary privilege, the balance of convenience falls firmly against granting relief due to the strong public interest in allowing the Parliamentary complaints process to proceed and the limited risk of irreparable harm to the claimant.
Source excerpt
Lowe, R (On the Application Of) v Independent Complaints and Grievance Scheme [2026] EWHC 406 (Admin) (24 February 2026)
The High Court refused interim relief in a judicial review over an ICGS investigation, holding that Parliament privilege raised a serious issue but the balance of convenience opposed a pause.
D1914 & Anor, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2025] EWHC 1853 (Admin) (21 July 2025)
Administrative Court review of the Brook House Inquiry response. The court held Article 3 did not require implementation of every recommendation, refused AAA permission, and transferred AVY’s claims for trial.
The High Court rejected challenges to the Government’s response to the Brook House Inquiry, holding there was no duty to implement its recommendations.
Explore more
