Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
England and Wales decisions
Decisions matching the current search
Kyte v MclAren Automotive Ltd & Anor [2026] EWHC 1126 (TCC) (19 May 2026)
The High Court struck out inadequately particularised contract and negligence claims over a car fire, but allowed time to amend the pleadings.
The High Court struck out a vehicle fire claim for inadequate pleading, holding that the claimant had not sufficiently particularised breach, causation, or negligence.
The Court of Appeal set aside a case-management order for a preliminary trial on settlement and unconscionability issues, finding the hybrid use of assumptions and findings unworkable.
Castleton v Post Office Ltd & Anor (Rev1) [2026] EWCA Civ 577 (12 May 2026)
The Court of Appeal set aside a case management order that used a hybrid approach to preliminary issues about a settlement deed and unconscionability in the Post Office litigation.
BPA v NXT [2026] EWHC 1095 (KB) (08 May 2026)
The High Court struck out some defective claims, ordered amendments and a medical report, and granted anonymity in a case alleging sexual assault and harassment.
The High Court struck out parts of a sexual assault and harassment claim, ordered amended particulars and a medical report, and granted anonymity to both parties.
TWH Legal Services Ltd (t/a B&l Solicitors) & Anor v Niazi & Anor [2026] EWHC 746 (KB) (27 March 2026)
The High Court held that three online reviews about a solicitor were defamatory of the second claimant, but not of the firm, and that parts were fact while others were opinion.
The Upper Tribunal held that deliberate inaccuracy in tax returns does not necessarily mean dishonesty, and dismissed New Claire Wine Limited’s appeal.
The appeal fails because the conflicts of interest issue was pleaded and presented narrowly, the judge's findings of fact are unchallenged, and causation and loss were not adequately pleaded or proved; even if a conflict existed, it would not have caused loss.
Source excerpt
Merck Sharp & Dohme (UK) Ltd v Halozyme Inc [2026] EWHC 121 (Pat) (21 January 2026)
The court held Halozyme’s amended infringement statement was too sparse and ordered a compliant version. MSD was also ordered to use best endeavours to provide an Alt-B4 sample.
Explore more
