Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
England and Wales decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The Divisional Court refused permission for judicial review of a limited tax consultation on APR and BPR reforms, finding no legitimate expectation, delay, and parliamentary privilege.
Heart of Wales Care Ltd & Ors v The Council of the City And County of Swansea - [2026] EWHC 899 (Admin) (17 April 2026)
The court held that Swansea Council’s care-home fee uplift decision was unlawful for failing to comply with statutory code requirements and for inadequate consultation over NI changes.
The High Court refused permission for judicial review of Oxfordshire’s congestion charging order, finding the consultation and equality assessment were legally adequate.
Open Roads for Oxford Ltd, R (On the Application Of) v Oxfordshire County Council [2026] EWHC 695 (Admin) (24 March 2026)
The High Court refused renewed permission for judicial review of Oxfordshire County Council’s congestion charging order, holding the consultation and equality assessment were lawful.
The Court of Appeal dismissed a challenge to North Yorkshire Council’s traffic orders for Harrogate, rejecting complaints about consultation, sequencing and report adequacy.
A & E Baines v The North Yorkshire Council [2026] EWCA Civ 257 (12 March 2026)
The Court of Appeal dismissed a challenge to four traffic regulation orders in Harrogate, holding that further public consultation was not required and the decision was lawful.
Sex Matters v Mayor and Commonalty and Citizens of the City of London [2026] EWHC 149 (Admin) (29 January 2026)
Permission for judicial review was refused because the challenge to Hampstead Heath pond admission arrangements was premature, with no fresh decision yet made.
Permission for judicial review was refused as premature, because the City of London Corporation was still consulting on pond admissions and had not made a fresh decision.
The Court of Appeal held that Tower Hamlets unlawfully revoked a Bethnal Green LTN because section 151 of the 1999 Act required retention unless the LIP was revised. Other challenge grounds failed.
Permission was refused in a judicial review challenge to consent for the Liverpool Bay CCS project. The court found no arguable error and held the claim was not prompt.
Explore more
