Sign in
England and Wales Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

England and Wales Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
0 court collections
Last checked

England and Wales decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Administrative law [2026] EWHC 1016 (Admin)

GVH, R (On the Application Of) v Leicester, Leicestershire and Rutland Integrated Care Board

GVH, R (On the Application Of) v Leicester, Leicestershire and Rutland Integrated Care Board [2026] EWHC 1016 (Admin) (01 May 2026)

Permission for judicial review was refused over a reduced continuing care package, the court holding that the statutory complaints process was an adequate alternative remedy.

  • Judicial review
  • Alternative remedy
  • Children's continuing care
  • Disability rights
  • Public body decision-making
  • Judicial-review
Read case analysis
Tax law

Royal Surrey NHS Foundation Trust, R (on the application of) v The Commissioners for HMRC

The Trust was entitled to the benefit of the Concession as its intention at the time of supply was for business use, evidenced by Board resolution prior to delivery. HMRC erred in law by focusing on Supply Chain’s intention and misapprehending the requirements of the Concession. The Tribunal had no jurisdiction; judicial review was the proper forum. The decision of 31 March 2021 was quashed.

  • Vat concessions
  • Legitimate expectation
  • Judicial review procedure
  • Input tax recovery
  • Nhs vat division
  • Public body decision-making
Read case analysis
Administrative law [2022] EWHC 1899 (Admin)

Pollock, R (On the Application Of) v CYSUR: Mid and West Wales Safeguarding Children Board

Pollock, R (On the Application Of) v CYSUR: Mid and West Wales Safeguarding Children Board [2022] EWHC 1899 (Admin) (26 July 2022)

The High Court held that the refusal to disclose a serious case review overview was a fresh decision made in 2021, so the judicial review was in time; alternatively, time would be extended.

  • Disclosure of serious case review reports
  • Judicial review time limits
  • Public body decision-making
  • Confidentiality and transparency
  • Extension of time
  • Judicial-review-time-limits
Read case analysis
Administrative law [2020] EWCA Civ 1037

Cotter (A Child), R (On the Application Of) v The National Institute for Health And Care Excellence (NICE) & Anor (Rev 1)

Cotter (A Child), R (On the Application Of) v The National Institute for Health And Care Excellence (NICE) & Anor (Rev 1) [2020] EWCA Civ 1037 (06 August 2020)

The Court of Appeal dismissed a challenge to NICE’s decision to appraise Kuvan under the standard HTA procedure rather than the HST route.

  • Judicial review
  • Statutory interpretation
  • Health technology appraisal
  • Nhs commissioning
  • Public body decision-making
  • Judicial-review
Read case analysis
Administrative law [2012] EWHC 1538 (Admin)

Asian Music Circuit, R (on the application of) v Arts Council England

Asian Music Circuit, R (on the application of) v Arts Council England [2012] EWHC 1538 (Admin) (01 June 2012)

Judicial review of Arts Council England’s refusal of funding to Asian Music Circuit failed. The court held the decision-making process was lawful and not irrational.

  • Judicial review
  • Public funding
  • Procedural fairness
  • Irrationality
  • Public body decision-making
  • Judicial-review
Read case analysis
Administrative law [2010] EWHC 2593 (Admin)

Booker, R (on the application of) v NHS Oldham & Anor

Booker, R (on the application of) v NHS Oldham & Anor [2010] EWHC 2593 (Admin) (28 October 2010)

The court held that NHS Oldham unlawfully withdrew continuing healthcare from a claimant before her agreed private funding began, and extended time for judicial review.

  • Nhs continuing healthcare
  • Judicial review
  • Public body decision-making
  • Personal injury damages
  • Healthcare funding
  • Statutory duties of nhs
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

England and Wales decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.