Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
England and Wales decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The court held FLOWERBX was valid and infringed by FLOWERSBOX, FLOWERS BOX and FLOWERS BOX LONDON, rejecting descriptiveness and non-use arguments.
High Court appeal in a trade mark opposition over GRILLOUMI and GRILLOUMAKI. The court upheld refusal of confusion and unfair-advantage grounds under the HALLOUMI collective mark.
Acedes Holdings, LLC & Anor v Clive Sutton Ltd & Anor [2023] EWHC 2005 (IPEC) (07 August 2023)
The court dismissed a trade mark counterclaim over the AC Cobra mark, finding the defendants lacked standing as licensees under the relevant Ford marks.
The High Court held Samsung liable in part for trade mark infringement over watch face apps in its app store, and rejected its e-Commerce Directive defence.
The High Court dismissed an appeal in a trade mark opposition, upholding refusal of MANPOWER-related marks under section 5(3) of the Trade Marks Act 1994.
Sky Plc & Ors v Skykick UK Ltd & Anor [2018] EWHC 155 (Ch) (06 February 2018)
High Court trade mark trial on Sky’s claims against SkyKick, addressing infringement, passing off, and counterclaims on invalidity for bad faith and unclear specifications.
W3 Ltd v Easygroup Ltd & Anor [2018] EWHC 7 (Ch) (12 January 2018)
High Court trade mark dispute over EasyRoommate and easyGroup’s EASY marks, involving validity, non-use revocation, passing off, and groundless threats.
The High Court dismissed Assos’ challenge to the ASOS UK trade mark, finding no likelihood of confusion, passing off risk, or unfair advantage.
Maier & Anor v Asos Plc & Anor [2014] EWHC 123 (Ch) (04 February 2014)
The High Court dismissed Assos’ partial invalidity challenge to ASOS’ UK trade mark, save for narrow specification carve-outs for cycling-related goods.
Appeal allowed in a trade mark opposition. The High Court held that the hearing officer erred on use and on assessing Lonsdale’s mark family, confusion, and unfair advantage.
Explore more
