Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
England and Wales decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The High Court assessed damages after a Court of Appeal remittal in a Wesos supply dispute, fixing the reasonable market price, deductions, and interest.
Ksy Juice Blends UK Ltd v Citrosuco GmbH [2026] EWHC 764 (Comm) (30 March 2026)
High Court damages judgment on a Wesos supply contract, assessing non-acceptance losses, reasonable market price, deduction of avoided costs, and interest.
The Imaging Centre Assets Ltd v Canon Medical Systems Ltd [2026] EWHC 311 (Ch) (13 February 2026)
The court refused summary judgment on liability in a contract dispute over orders for medical imaging units, holding that key issues over price, delivery and implied terms required trial.
The High Court refused summary judgment in a contract dispute over medical imaging equipment, holding that price, payment, delivery, and order terms required trial.
Commercial Court held that Onex was not liable for an Iraqi SRFO cargo containing 16ppm organic chlorides; the contract’s “typicals” were not binding warranties.
Moeve Trading SAU v Mael Trading FZ LLC (Rev1) [2026] EWHC 17 (Comm) (13 January 2026)
The High Court granted summary judgment for the seller for the cargo price, holding that the letters of credit were conditional payment only and that title had passed.
The Supreme Court held that English law does not recognise a Mackay v Dick doctrine of deemed fulfilment, so the sellers could not claim the deposits as debts.
Secretary of State for Health and Social Care v PPE Medpro Ltd [2025] EWHC 2486 (Comm) (01 October 2025)
Commercial Court judgment on PPE Medpro’s sterile gowns contract, addressing sterility assurance, CE marking, rejection of goods, and repayment claims.
The products sold were not medicinal products under HMR 2012; thus, their sale was not illegal and no actionable misrepresentation or breach of implied terms occurred. Claimant's losses resulted from market collapse, not regulatory prohibition. Even if misrepresentation or breach were established, rescission would not be permitted due to risk of unjust enrichment; damages would be limited to actual loss, which was not proven.
Source excerpt
KSY Juice Blends UK Ltd v Citrosuco GmbH [2025] EWCA Civ 760 (19 June 2025)
The Court of Appeal held that the Wesos contract was enforceable for the full quantity and implied a reasonable or market price for the open-priced 800MT tranche.
Explore more
