Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
England and Wales decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The court has power under section 42 to enforce peremptory orders of the arbitral tribunal and grants the order sought in paragraph 1 of the draft order, but declines to exercise discretion under section 37 as it is not just and convenient to grant broader relief beyond the scope of the tribunal's peremptory orders.
Source excerpt
The High Court held that consent to assign certain liquidation-related contractual rights could be given without breaching sanctions legislation.
The court held that the claimant's proposed categories of confidential information relating to OFAC and US State Department communications are justified for inclusion in the confidentiality ring order due to their sensitivity and potential for harm if disclosed. The court rejected the defendant's proposals to impose additional liability and restrictions on confidentiality ring members as unduly onerous and unjustified, but accepted the defendant's proposed security measures as reasonable and proportionate. The court determined that requests for details of protective measures must be reasonabl…
Source excerpt
The Court of Appeal held that the High Court judge's evaluative decision to substitute a 12-month suspension with review for erasure was within the bounds of reasonable decision-making, properly applied the Sanctions Guidance, and gave sufficient reasons. Erasure was not mandatory; suspension was a serious sanction marking the gravity of the misconduct, and remediation was possible and evidenced.
Source excerpt
The High Court dismissed the Professional Standards Authority’s appeal against a 12-month suspension imposed on a doctor for boundary-crossing and sexual misconduct with a vulnerable former patient.
The High Court dismissed a sanctions review challenge to the family-association designation criterion and the claimant’s maintained designation under the Russia Regulations.
The High Court dismissed Dr Michael Mew’s appeal against GDC erasure, upheld the PCC’s findings on expert evidence and misconduct, and refused fresh evidence.
Mew v General Dental Council [2026] EWHC 1116 (Admin) (15 May 2026)
High Court appeal in dental discipline dismissed. The court upheld findings that Dr Mew’s orthotropic treatment claims and treatment of two children were not clinically indicated and were misleading.
Stenhouse v The Bar Standards Board [2026] EWHC 1117 (Admin) (13 May 2026)
High Court appeal from a Bar Standards Board disciplinary decision dismissed. The court upheld findings that a barrister made unfounded allegations and rejected bias, fairness, and sanction challenges.
The High Court dismissed barrister John Stenhouse’s appeal against BSB disciplinary findings for sending emails alleging secret collusion and a cover-up.
Explore more
