Sandoz Limited v Bristol-Myers Squibb Holdings Ireland Unlimited Company
The Application did not make it plausible that apixaban had useful factor Xa inhibitory activity. There was no data or reasoning in the Application linking apixaban to the asserted technical effect, and the skilled person would not infer from the Application that apixaban had been tested and found to have the required potency. The assertion of utility was speculative. Therefore, the patent was invalid for lack of inventive step and insufficiency.
Source excerpt
- Patent validity
- Inventive step
- Sufficiency of disclosure
- Plausibility
- Second medical use claims