Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
England and Wales decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The Court of Appeal set aside a case-management order for a preliminary trial on settlement and unconscionability issues, finding the hybrid use of assumptions and findings unworkable.
Castleton v Post Office Ltd & Anor (Rev1) [2026] EWCA Civ 577 (12 May 2026)
The Court of Appeal set aside a case management order that used a hybrid approach to preliminary issues about a settlement deed and unconscionability in the Post Office litigation.
Lish v The Northern Block Ltd & Anor [2026] EWCA Civ 497 (27 April 2026)
The Court of Appeal reinstated Mrs Lish’s unpaid royalties claim but upheld strike-out of a separate copyright infringement claim as an abuse of process.
The Court of Appeal allowed an appeal on unpaid royalties but upheld strike-out of later copyright infringement claims as an abuse of process.
The High Court dismissed both a claim for a share of sale proceeds and a counterclaim over alleged profit-sharing, finding no binding contract, estoppel, or settlement agreement.
Leddington & Anor v Sandercock & Anor [2026] EWHC 938 (Ch) (24 April 2026)
The High Court rejected claims for a share of Arches’ sale proceeds and dismissed a related counterclaim over an alleged profit-share agreement.
The High Court dismissed applications to strike out a claim, discharge injunctions, and require fortification. Covert recordings were admitted only for the applications.
Fitrite Fencing and Decking Ltd v Ross & Anor [2026] EWHC 708 (Ch) (24 March 2026)
The High Court dismissed defendants’ applications to strike out and vary injunctions in a dispute over alleged misuse of company funds and a settlement agreement.
Visa Inc & Ors v Luxottica Retail UK Ltd [2026] EWHC 615 (Comm) (17 March 2026)
The High Court held that Luxottica’s settlement with Visa covered GrandVision’s later claims after GrandVision joined the group, but refused specific performance.
The Defendant was appointed as fiduciary agent/trustee of the Company, owed fiduciary duties, made fraudulent misrepresentations to induce appointment, and dishonestly paid away Company funds for personal benefit. Equitable compensation is not barred by delay, laches, unclean hands, or the Settlement Deed. The Defendant is liable to pay equitable compensation for the total of Company funds dishonestly paid away.
Source excerpt
Explore more
