Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
England and Wales decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The Tribunal allowed Avdi Alija’s appeal, finding him stateless and holding that deportation would be disproportionate given Article 3 risk and very compelling circumstances.
The Tribunal dismissed Bahjat Tahir Abdulla’s appeal against deprivation of British citizenship, finding he had used false identity details and misstated good character.
Permission to apply for judicial review was refused because the claim against the Home Office was premature, no final deportation decision had been made, and alternative remedies existed. The claims against the Secretary of State for Justice regarding prison categorisation and HDC were lawfully based on ongoing deportation proceedings, with no exceptional circumstances established. No arguable merit was found in any grounds, so extension of time and interim relief were also refused.
Source excerpt
Campbell, R (On the Application Of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2026] EWHC 289 (Admin) (13 February 2026)
The High Court held that refusal to issue a British National (Overseas) passport was lawful because the claimant was not registered as a BNO and had not made a late registration application.
The High Court held that the claimant was not a British Overseas Citizen. It followed Motala, found her parents lost CUKC status on Zambian independence, and held she was not stateless at birth.
Sinkala v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Rev1) [2026] EWHC 59 (KB) (22 January 2026)
The High Court held that the claimant was not a British Overseas Citizen because her parents lost any CUKC status on Zambian independence and she was not stateless at birth.
The UK Supreme Court held that deprivation of citizenship appeals are substantive appeals on the merits, and that fairness was satisfied by the statutory appeal process.
PM and PF are not Eleanor's parents and never held parental responsibility; Eleanor's welfare requires adoption by her current carer, as placement with PM and PF would cause further emotional harm due to false narratives and lack of attachment.
Source excerpt
The court held the 2023 immigration bail electronic monitoring condition unlawful because there was no prospect of removal to Turkey. Permission to challenge the 2018 condition was refused.
Taskiran, R (On the Application Of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2025] EWHC 2574 (Admin) (10 October 2025)
The court held that the 2023 electronic monitoring condition was unlawful because there was no prospect of the claimant’s removal to Turkey.
Explore more
