Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
England and Wales decisions
Decisions matching the current search
Summary judgment was granted for the defendants on liability for Claim 2. The court held Persimmon had no realistic prospect of proving an extension of time.
The Commercial Court partly struck out a defence and counterclaim for inadequate pleading, but left valuation and appropriation issues for trial.
The High Court dismissed the claim against Mr Mandelli, holding the pleaded facts did not show he personally assumed responsibility to the Claimants.
The High Court dismissed a strike-out and summary judgment application in a probate dispute over whether a 2021 will was valid and whether earlier Court of Protection findings bound the estate.
The High Court granted summary judgment for the defendants on breach of contract, misrepresentation, and interference claims, leaving only a possible ÂŁ25,000 expense claim against FareShare.
Navaian & Anor v King Charles III Charitable Fund & Ors [2026] EWHC 1220 (KB) (21 May 2026)
The High Court held that claims over a failed fundraising collaboration had no realistic prospect of success, save for an arguable ÂŁ25,000 expenses claim against FareShare.
The Commercial Court held that an SPA clause gave the English courts exclusive jurisdiction and restrained Italian proceedings brought by Nio.
Diageo DV Ltd v Nio SRL [2026] EWHC 1198 (Comm) (19 May 2026)
The High Court held that an SPA clause gave the English court exclusive jurisdiction, restrained Italian proceedings, and granted summary judgment and declarations.
The High Court dismissed a summary judgment application in an insolvency/company dispute, adjourned trial, and held the respondents had a realistic prospect of defending the claims.
Henderson & Jones Ltd v Chambers & Anor (Re Priors Group Ltd) [2026] EWHC 1152 (Ch) (14 May 2026)
Summary judgment on alleged misapplication of company funds was refused. The court held the defendants had realistic prospects of defence and adjourned trial after late evidence was admitted.
Explore more
