Sign in
England and Wales Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

England and Wales Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
0 court collections
Last checked

England and Wales decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Criminal law

R v Christopher Scott Taylor

The sentencing judge properly exercised discretion, considered the correct guideline, and balanced the relevant factors. The seriousness of repeated domestic abuse justified immediate custody, and the decision not to suspend was not unreasonable.

  • Sentencing
  • Domestic violence
  • Assault
  • Intentional strangulation
  • Suspension of sentence
Read case analysis
Civil procedure

Lee Mavin v Kare Wyatt

The Court of Appeal resentenced a contemnor to 6 months’ concurrent imprisonment for five counts of contempt arising from fraudulent use of the Breathing Space scheme.

  • Committal for contempt
  • Abuse of debt respite scheme
  • Sentencing principles
  • Suspension of sentence
  • Civil-contempt
  • Sentencing
Read case analysis
Criminal law

R v Rhys Courtney

The Court of Appeal upheld an 18-month prison sentence for causing serious injury by dangerous driving during unlawful street racing, refusing suspension and a shorter ban.

  • Dangerous driving
  • Sentencing
  • Appeal against sentence
  • Suspension of sentence
  • Dangerous-driving
  • Sentencing-appeals
Read case analysis
Criminal law

R v Tommy Lee Taylor

The Court of Appeal upheld a 15-month sentence for perverting the course of justice and assisting crime, rejecting the argument that custody should have been suspended.

  • Perverting the course of justice
  • Encouraging or assisting crime
  • Sentencing
  • Suspension of sentence
  • Perverting-the-course-of-justice
  • Encouraging-or-assisting-crime
Read case analysis
Criminal law

R v Thomas Brand

The judge properly exercised discretion in refusing to suspend the sentence, considering the seriousness, duration, and risk factors; the prohibitions in the Sexual Harm Prevention Order were proportionate and justified by the assessed risk to children.

  • Indecent images of children
  • Sentencing
  • Sexual harm prevention orders
  • Suspension of sentence
Read case analysis
Criminal law

R v Mark Fuller

The overall sentence was not manifestly excessive given the seriousness, aggravating features, and risk posed by the appellant; the judge's approach to categorisation, mitigation, and totality was justified; and the prospect of rehabilitation did not outweigh the need for immediate custody.

  • Sentencing
  • Assault occasioning actual bodily harm
  • Criminal damage
  • Totality principle
  • Suspension of sentence
  • Mitigation
Read case analysis
Criminal law

R v Mark Anthony Hall

The appellant's conduct fell within category 2B due to lack of prior knowledge, lesser role, and excessive self-defence; the sentence before credit for plea should not exceed 18 months, reduced to 16 months with credit. The seriousness of the offence required immediate custody, not suspension.

  • Violent disorder
  • Sentencing
  • Joint enterprise
  • Self-defence
  • Suspension of sentence
Read case analysis
Criminal law [2026] EWCA Crim 67

Taylor, R. v

Taylor, R. v [2026] EWCA Crim 67 (16 January 2026)

The Court of Appeal dismissed a sentence appeal, holding that immediate custody for serious domestic abuse offences was a reasonable refusal to suspend the sentence.

  • Sentencing
  • Domestic violence
  • Suspension of sentence
  • Assault
  • Strangulation
  • Sentence-suspension
Read case analysis
Criminal law [2026] EWCA Crim 66

Selamaj & Anor, R. v

Selamaj & Anor, R. v [2026] EWCA Crim 66 (14 January 2026)

The Court of Appeal reduced affray sentences for two appellants after finding the original terms excessive, but upheld the cannabis sentence and refused suspension.

  • Sentencing
  • Affray
  • Possession of bladed article
  • Cultivation of cannabis
  • Mitigation
  • Suspension of sentence
Read case analysis
Criminal law [2025] EWCA Crim 1754

Brand, R. v

Brand, R. v [2025] EWCA Crim 1754 (17 December 2025)

The Court of Appeal dismissed Thomas Brand’s sentence appeal, upholding immediate custody and a Sexual Harm Prevention Order for indecent image offences.

  • Indecent images of children
  • Sentencing
  • Sexual harm prevention order
  • Suspension of sentence
  • Sentencing-appeal
  • Indecent-images-of-children
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

England and Wales decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.