Sign in
England and Wales Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

England and Wales Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
0 court collections
Last checked

England and Wales decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Defamation [2019] EWHC 3433 (QB)

Triaster Ltd v Dun & Bradstreet Ltd

Triaster Ltd v Dun & Bradstreet Ltd [2019] EWHC 3433 (QB) (12 December 2019)

Preliminary defamation ruling on a business credit report. The court held the report did not impute poor creditworthiness or a defamatory level of insolvency risk.

  • Meaning of defamatory statements
  • Fact vs opinion in defamation
  • Business credit reports
  • Threshold of seriousness in defamation
  • Commercial reputation
  • Defamation
Read case analysis
Defamation [2019] EWHC 1349

Otuo v Watch Tower Bible And Tract Society of Britain

Otuo v Watch Tower Bible And Tract Society of Britain [2019] EWHC 1349 (QB) (07 June 2019)

Trial judgment in slander claims arising from Jehovah’s Witness disciplinary announcements. The court held the publications caused no more than trivial reputational harm and dismissed both claims.

  • Slander actionable per se
  • Threshold of seriousness in defamation
  • Qualified privilege
  • Vicarious liability
  • Ultra vires acts
  • Consent to publication
Read case analysis
Defamation

Building Register Ltd v Weston & Anor

Preliminary defamation issues on an online complaint website: the court found the words complained of were defamatory and distinguished between fact and comment.

  • Meaning of defamatory statements
  • Fact vs comment distinction
  • Honest comment defence
  • Threshold of seriousness in defamation
  • Defamation
  • Fact-vs-comment
Read case analysis
Defamation [2014] EWHC 701 (QB)

McEvoy v Michael

McEvoy v Michael [2014] EWHC 701 (QB) (18 March 2014)

Preliminary issues in a defamation claim over Labour Party newsletters. The court held the defendant was responsible for publication and that several passages were defamatory comment.

  • Responsibility for publication
  • Meaning of defamatory statements
  • Comment vs fact
  • Threshold of seriousness in defamation
  • Defamation
  • Publication-responsibility
Read case analysis
Defamation [2013] EWHC 3205

Briggs v Jordan & Ors

Briggs v Jordan & Ors [2013] EWHC 3205 (QB) (24 October 2013)

The High Court refused permission to amend a libel claim over passages in a former business partner’s autobiography and struck out the action.

  • Meaning of defamatory statements
  • Threshold of seriousness in defamation
  • Confidentiality clauses
  • Misuse of private information
  • Defamation
  • Libel
Read case analysis
Defamation

Briggs v Jordan & Ors

The High Court refused Andrew Briggs permission to amend his libel claim over Simon Jordan’s autobiography and struck out the action.

  • Libel
  • Confidentiality clauses
  • Misuse of private information
  • Threshold of seriousness in defamation
  • Abuse of process
  • Defamation
Read case analysis
Defamation [2013] EWHC 1435

Fox v Boulter

Fox v Boulter [2013] EWHC 1435 (QB) (04 June 2013)

Preliminary defamation ruling on meaning. The website article was capable of a defamatory meaning, but the broadcast extracts were not.

  • Meaning of defamatory statements
  • Natural and ordinary meaning
  • Innuendo meaning
  • Threshold of seriousness in defamation
  • Defamation
  • Media-law
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

England and Wales decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.