Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
England and Wales decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The EAT dismissed Mr Jarosinski’s appeal, holding that Nestle’s consolidated response was valid, any objection was waived, and the 100% remedy deductions were adequately reasoned.
The Upper Tribunal held that long tolerated parking did not permanently release the covenant, but the landlord had not given reasonable notice to resume strict rights.
The defendant made false representations about the SPV 20 loan, knowing them to be untrue, with intent to induce investment. The claimants relied on these representations and suffered loss. The defendant has no real prospect of successfully defending the claim, and there is no compelling reason for trial. Summary judgment is granted.
Source excerpt
The High Court allowed an appeal on a section 69 point of law concerning demurrage, holding that laytime does not start on an invalid NOR absent agreement, waiver, or estoppel.
UK Global Healthcare Ltd v Secretary of State for Health and Social Care [2026] EWHC 561 (TCC) (12 March 2026)
Summary judgment and strike out were refused in a glove-supply dispute, with the court finding triable issues on prevention, waiver, estoppel, and contractual expiry.
Romal Capital (C02) Ltd v Peel L&P (Ports) Ltd [2025] EWHC 3016 (Ch) (18 November 2025)
High Court trial judgment on a Liverpool Waters planning and contract dispute, holding that Peel breached cooperation duties under an agreement for lease and assessing lost-chance damages.
Lowry Trading Ltd & Anor v Haycox [2025] EWHC 2754 (Comm) (09 October 2025)
The High Court granted summary judgment on a deceit claim over SPV 20, finding the defendant made knowingly false statements to induce investment and raised no real defence.
Mr Lyons carried on business in England and Wales during the relevant period by letting and selling the Hamilton Terrace property in his personal capacity, establishing jurisdiction for the bankruptcy petition. The grounds of opposition to the debt are dismissed as lacking bona fide substance, being inherently and commercially implausible, unsupported by evidence, and not previously raised. Procedural defects regarding delay are waived as no prejudice was shown.
Source excerpt
The defendant was entitled to demand repayment as the moneys had fallen due for payment under the fixed-term arrangement. There was no waiver of the three-year term, and the claimants' interpretation of the loan terms was not supported by the documents. The application for an injunction was refused, and the Part 8 claim was dismissed.
Source excerpt
The High Court held the policy did not provide business interruption cover for a delayed care-home opening, but declined summary judgment on a section 13A delay counterclaim.
Explore more
