Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
England and Wales decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The First-tier Tribunal dismissed an EUSS appeal after finding no evidence of the claimed family relationship or dependency needed for settled or pre-settled status.
The Tribunal dismissed an EU Settlement Scheme appeal because the appellant failed to show that her father was a relevant sponsor under Appendix EU.
BHO, R (On the Application Of) v Secretary of State for Heath and Social Care & Anor [2026] EWHC 517 (Admin) (10 March 2026)
The High Court held that Article 18.1 Withdrawal Agreement residence status is prospective only, upheld NHS charging during the interim period, and refused a CJEU reference.
Parabolica Ltd v Tesla Holding AS [2026] EWHC 386 (Ch) (23 February 2026)
The High Court held that bad faith in a UK trade mark application derived from a pending EU filing is assessed by reference to the EU filing date, not the UK filing date.
Molnar v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2026] EWCA Civ 31 (29 January 2026)
The Court of Appeal held that post-transition deportation for offences committed after IP completion day is governed by national law, not EU proportionality rules.
The Upper Tribunal held that the UK, not Romania, was the competent state for Attendance Allowance under Regulation 883/2004 and remade the case accordingly.
Randhawa v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2025] EWCA Civ 1846 (01 December 2025)
The Court of Appeal granted permission to appeal in a challenge about EU Settlement Scheme residence rights based on an Italian residence card and Withdrawal Agreement arguments.
Ayoola v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2025] EWCA Civ 1519 (28 November 2025)
The Court of Appeal dismissed an immigration appeal, holding Article 25(2) of the Withdrawal Agreement did not give the appellant a right to reside under the EUSS.
The Court of Appeal dismissed an immigration appeal about Article 25(2) of the Withdrawal Agreement, holding it preserved no right to reside for the appellant.
The Supreme Court held that the child element of Universal Credit is not a separate family benefit under EU coordination rules and is not exportable.
Explore more
