Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
England and Wales decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The Upper Tribunal allowed Dr Khiljee’s appeal, holding that rack-rent under the Housing Act 2004 is assessed by reference to the actual HMO use, not a hypothetical lawful single-let use.
The Upper Tribunal held the First-tier Tribunal erred in law by treating PAYE as determinative of employment status and remitted the Carer’s Allowance appeal.
The Upper Tribunal dismissed RP’s appeal, holding the First-tier Tribunal made no error of law in finding no entitlement to the severe disability premium.
The Upper Tribunal held the First-tier Tribunal had erred in refusing to extend time to appeal a ÂŁ7,500 housing penalty and allowed the appeal.
Upper Tribunal allowed an appeal against a housing civil penalty, holding the First-tier Tribunal gave no adequate basis for finding the appellant managed the HMO.
The Upper Tribunal held that a let-only agent who received a single rent payment at the start of a tenancy was not a “person managing” an HMO.
The Upper Tribunal set aside a civil penalty for an unlicensed HMO, finding there was insufficient evidence that all five occupants, including Doris Anyanwu, lived there as their sole or main residence.
The Upper Tribunal allowed a landlord’s appeal against a housing civil penalty, holding that failure to update her Land Registry address could amount to a reasonable excuse.
The Upper Tribunal held that a claimant’s letter announcing retirement and a future pension did not disclose actual receipt of pension income, so ESA overpayments were recoverable.
The Upper Tribunal held the FTT had focused on extension of time instead of deciding whether notice of the penalty had been received, and remitted the case.
Explore more
