Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
England and Wales decisions
Decisions matching the current search
Kalidasan & Ors v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2026] EWCA Civ 561 (11 May 2026)
Permission to seek judicial review was granted in four linked immigration appeals about refusal to waive invalidity and give leave outside the Rules.
Ahmed v The Secretary of State for the Home Department [2026] EWCA Civ 509 (28 April 2026)
The Court of Appeal upheld the dismissal of an immigration appeal, holding that Article 8 did not require the appellant to remain pending family court proceedings.
KH, R (On the Application Of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2025] EWCA Civ 675 (22 May 2025)
The Court of Appeal dismissed a challenge to refusal of a certificate of travel, holding the Home Office lawfully applied its policy and no Article 8 breach arose.
The Court of Appeal dismissed an immigration appeal, holding that the Secretary of State did not act unfairly by failing to notify the appellant of sponsor-licence revocation before refusing leave.
Tammina & Anor v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2025] EWCA Civ 24 (20 January 2025)
The Court of Appeal dismissed an immigration appeal, holding that notice of sponsor-licence revocation was not procedurally required on these facts and distinguishing Pathan.
The High Court upheld the cancellation of a skilled worker’s leave after finding she worked in a convenience store and that this was not protected voluntary work.
The Upper Tribunal held that a director’s loan agreement had to show, in the agreement itself, that the loan was unsecured and subordinated. The judicial review was dismissed.
Hossain v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2024] EWCA Civ 608 (05 June 2024)
The Court of Appeal dismissed an immigration appeal, holding that extensive judicial questioning in the First-tier Tribunal did not make the hearing procedurally unfair.
UKSC held that refusal to grant leave to remain to a foreign criminal in self-induced limbo did not violate Article 8, given the strong public interest in immigration control.
The Upper Tribunal held that the appellant did not meet Immigration Rules paragraphs 197 and 199 because her mother was a British citizen, not a person with leave.
Explore more
