Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
England and Wales decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The just case management solution is to hear the remitted matters and the claimant’s summary judgment application separately and sequentially, with the remitted matters first, and not to stay the summary judgment application, balancing the interests of both parties and avoiding undue prejudice to other litigants.
Source excerpt
The court held that a director materially overstated turnover in a Bounce Back Loan application, made him unfit, and ordered disqualification and compensation.
The court granted the interlocutory injunction, finding a serious issue to be tried regarding the validity of the 2024 Agreements, that damages would not be an adequate remedy for the claimant due to the risk of business destruction, and that the balance of convenience favoured the claimant given the existential threat to its business and the purely financial prejudice to the defendant, despite the claimant's inability to meet a cross-undertaking in damages.
Source excerpt
Navaian & Anor v King Charles III Charitable Fund & Ors [2026] EWHC 1220 (KB) (21 May 2026)
The High Court held that claims over a failed fundraising collaboration had no realistic prospect of success, save for an arguable £25,000 expenses claim against FareShare.
The High Court granted summary judgment for the defendants on breach of contract, misrepresentation, and interference claims, leaving only a possible £25,000 expense claim against FareShare.
Mittal v Barclays Bank PLC & Ors [2026] EWHC 1029 (Ch) (01 May 2026)
The court allowed amendment of a property claim to plead proprietary estoppel and constructive trust, but refused a challenge to receivers’ appointment and deferred rescission issues.
Car-Wizard Ltd v Vixen Surface Treatments Ltd [2026] EWHC 685 (Ch) (26 March 2026)
The High Court found actionable misrepresentations about a wheel lathe’s newness, capabilities, and safety, and held the claimant suffered loss.
The High Court held the defendant liable for breach of a collateral contract and negligent misrepresentation over a defective lathe, with damages to be assessed.
The Court of Appeal held that a secure tenant who obtained housing by misrepresentation was intentionally homeless when possession followed the fraud-induced tenancy.
Munemo v City of Wolverhampton Council [2026] EWCA Civ 329 (20 March 2026)
The Court of Appeal held that a tenant who obtained a secure tenancy by misrepresentation was intentionally homeless when eviction followed a possession order under statutory grounds.
Explore more
