Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
England and Wales decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The EAT dismissed Mr Grantham’s appeal, holding that any failure to consider medical evidence about autism was not material to the strike out and reconsideration decisions.
The EAT dismissed Mr Jarosinski’s appeal, holding that Nestle’s consolidated response was valid, any objection was waived, and the 100% remedy deductions were adequately reasoned.
Mortimer, Application for Reconsideration [2026] PBRA 73 (05 May 2026)
The Parole Board refused Mortimer’s application to reconsider a decision not to direct his release, finding no irrationality or procedural unfairness.
Marley, Application for Reconsideration [2026] PBRA 94 (01 May 2026)
The Parole Board refused Marley’s reconsideration application, holding that its earlier refusal to direct release was not irrational and was supported by the evidence.
Adamson, Application for Reconsideration [2026] PBRA 89 (01 May 2026)
The Parole Board refused Adamson’s application to reconsider a paper decision not to direct his release, finding no error of law, irrationality, or procedural unfairness.
Canning, Application for Reconsideration [2026] PBRA 92 (28 April 2026)
The Parole Board refused reconsideration of a decision not to direct release, finding no procedural unfairness, irrationality, or error of law.
Bernard, Application for Reconsideration [2026] PBRA 90 (28 April 2026)
The Parole Board refused Bernard’s application for reconsideration, finding no irrationality, procedural unfairness, or error of law in the panel’s refusal to direct release.
How, Application for Reconsideration [2026] PBRA 91 (28 April 2026)
The Parole Board refused How’s reconsideration application, finding no irrationality or procedural unfairness in the panel’s refusal to direct release.
Hodgson, Application for Reconsideration [2026] PBRA 88 (28 April 2026)
The Parole Board refused Hodgson’s application to reconsider a decision not to direct release, finding no irrationality, error of law, or material factual error.
Baker, Application for Reconsideration [2026] PBRA 87 (27 April 2026)
The Parole Board refused Baker’s application to reconsider its refusal of release, finding no procedural unfairness, irrationality, or material error of fact.
Explore more
