Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
England and Wales decisions
Decisions matching the current search
InterDigital Technology Corporation & Ors v Lenovo Group Ltd & Ors [2023] EWHC 1583 (Pat) (04 July 2023)
FRAND trial over InterDigital’s SEP portfolio and Lenovo’s licence terms, with the court rejecting both sides’ main offers and addressing injunction relief.
Astrazeneca UK Ltd v Tesaro, Inc. [2023] EWHC 803 (Ch) (05 April 2023)
The High Court construed royalty provisions in AstraZeneca’s patent licence agreements with Tesaro and held royalties were payable on all net sales of Zejula in licensed countries.
Eteboxagu AB v Cycle Pharmaceuticals Ltd [2023] EWHC 462 (Comm) (06 March 2023)
The court held rebates to PBMs must be deducted from royalty calculations, rejected the distribution-partner argument, and found no estoppel by convention.
The court construed a royalty agreement for nitisinone sales, holding that US PBM rebates were deductible, no distribution partner existed, and Cycle had to procure certification.
The Court of Appeal upheld damages findings in a breach of confidence claim over LLIN technology, distinguishing direct misuse from later derived products.
Vestergaard Frandsen A/S (now Called MVF 3Aps) v Bestnet Europe Ltd & Ors [2014] EWHC 3159 (Ch) (03 October 2014)
Damages were assessed for misuse of confidential information in developing mosquito nets. The court awarded lost profits on First Formula sales and a royalty on remaining sales.
Inquiry as to damages for infringement of a performer’s rights in Heartbroken, with a 6% hypothetical royalty, plus £5,000 for unfair profits.
The court assessed damages for misuse of confidential information in developing mosquito nets, awarding lost profits and a royalty for First Formula nets, plus a consultancy fee for Later Formula nets.
Temple Island Collection Ltd v New English Teas Ltd & Anor [2011] EWPCC 21 (29 July 2011)
The court construed a copyright settlement, upheld royalties on the full price of multipacks, awarded licence-drafting costs, and refused specific performance.
Court of Appeal interpreted music licensing agreements, holding that online distribution royalties were payable at source and that album unbundling restrictions extended to digital recordings.
Explore more
