Eesti Vabariik (Pollumajanduse Registrite ja Informatsiooni Amet) (Agriculture - Common agricultural policy - Judgment) French Text [2024] EUECJ C-437/22 (29 February 2024)

Eesti Vabariik (Pollumajanduse Registrite ja Informatsiooni Amet) (Agriculture - Common agricultural policy - Judgment) French Text [2024] EUECJ C-437/22 (29 February 2024)

EU law (Regulation No 1306/2013, read with Regulation No 640/2014 and in light of Regulation No 2988/95) allows recovery of unduly paid agricultural subsidies not only from the formal beneficiary but also from individuals who, without being beneficiaries, deliberately provided false information to obtain the aid. However, such individuals cannot be considered 'beneficiaries' under the specific regulatory definitions unless they meet the explicit criteria.

Citation
[2024] EUECJ C-437/22
Parties
Accused: R. M.; Accused: E. M.; Claimant: Eesti Vabariik (Põllumajanduse Registrite ja Informatsiooni Amet); Intervener: Government of Denmark; Intervener: European Commission
Jurisdiction
European Union
Judgment Date
29 February 2024
Procedural Posture
Preliminary Ruling (renvoi Préjudiciel) / Judgment on Reference From Estonian Supreme Court
Outcome
Questions answered; preliminary ruling issued
Legal Topics
Common Agricultural Policy, EU Financial Interests Protection, Recovery of Unduly Paid Subsidies, Fraud, Interpretation of EU Regulations
European Union Law Agricultural Law Administrative Law Common Agricultural Policy EU Financial Interests Protection Recovery of Unduly Paid Subsidies Fraud Interpretation of EU Regulations

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 12 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

R. M.

Accused

E. M.

Accused

Eesti Vabariik (Põllumajanduse Registrite ja Informatsiooni Amet)

Claimant

Government of Denmark

Intervener

European Commission

Intervener

Procedural Posture

Preliminary Ruling (renvoi Préjudiciel) / Judgment on Reference From Estonian Supreme Court

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether EU law allows recovery of unduly paid agricultural subsidies from individuals who participated in fraud but are not formal beneficiaries
  2. 2 Whether company representatives who are also beneficial owners can be considered 'beneficiaries' under relevant EU regulations

Ratio Decidendi

EU law (Regulation No 1306/2013, read with Regulation No 640/2014 and in light of Regulation No 2988/95) allows recovery of unduly paid agricultural subsidies not only from the formal beneficiary but also from individuals who, without being beneficiaries, deliberately provided false information to obtain the aid. However, such individuals cannot be considered 'beneficiaries' under the specific regulatory definitions unless they meet the explicit criteria.

Court Disposition

Questions answered; preliminary ruling issued

Orders

  • Recovery of EU rural development aid unduly paid due to fraud can be pursued against persons who, without being formal beneficiaries, deliberately provided false information to obtain the aid.
  • Company representatives who are not formal beneficiaries under the regulatory definition cannot be considered 'beneficiaries' even if they are beneficial owners or receive the company's profits.