Rombi (Approximation of laws) [2000] EUECJ C-107/97 (18 May 2000)
Directive 89/398/EEC does not preclude Member States from maintaining national rules on additives for foodstuffs intended for particular nutritional uses, including those based on a different classification, in the absence of specific Community rules on such additives or composition. Individuals cannot rely on the Directive to challenge such national rules where no relevant Community rules exist. The principle of legitimate expectations does not apply in the absence of a Community-created expectation.
- Citation
- [2000] EUECJ C-107/97
- Parties
- Accused: Mr Rombi; Accused (civil Liability): Arkopharma SA; Intervener: French Government; Intervener: European Commission
- Jurisdiction
- European Union
- Judgment Date
- 18 May 2000
- Procedural Posture
- Preliminary Ruling (ecj) / Reference From Tribunal De Grande Instance, Grasse, in Criminal Proceedings
- Outcome
- Preliminary ruling issued; questions answered as set out in the judgment.
- Legal Topics
- Directive 89/398/eec, Foodstuffs for Particular Nutritional Uses, Transposition of Directives, Additives in Food, Legitimate Expectations, Free Movement of Goods
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mr Rombi
Accused
Arkopharma SA
Accused (civil Liability)
French Government
Intervener
European Commission
Intervener
Procedural Posture
Preliminary Ruling (ecj) / Reference From Tribunal De Grande Instance, Grasse, in Criminal Proceedings
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Directive 89/398/EEC precludes Member States from maintaining national rules on additives after transposition
- 2 Whether individuals can rely on the Directive to challenge national rules
- 3 Scope of the Directive regarding food supplements containing L-carnitine
Ratio Decidendi
Directive 89/398/EEC does not preclude Member States from maintaining national rules on additives for foodstuffs intended for particular nutritional uses, including those based on a different classification, in the absence of specific Community rules on such additives or composition. Individuals cannot rely on the Directive to challenge such national rules where no relevant Community rules exist. The principle of legitimate expectations does not apply in the absence of a Community-created expectation.
Court Disposition
Preliminary ruling issued; questions answered as set out in the judgment.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment