NJ (Parquet de Vienne) (area of freedom, security and justice - Opinion) French Text [2019] EUECJ C-489/19PPU_O (17 September 2019)
A system in which a public prosecutor, potentially subject to executive instructions, issues a European Arrest Warrant that is subject to prior and effective judicial review before taking effect, and where such review is open to appeal, can satisfy the requirements of independence and effective judicial protection under Article 6(1) of Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA, provided the review is substantive and not merely formal.
- Citation
- [2019] EUECJ C-489/19PPU_O
- Parties
- Subject of European Arrest Warrant: NJ; Issuing Authority (austria): Parquet de Vienne; Requesting Authority (germany): Generalstaatsanwaltschaft Berlin
- Jurisdiction
- European Union
- Judgment Date
- 17 September 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Preliminary Ruling (urgent Procedure) / Opinion of Advocate General
- Outcome
- Guidance to referring court: verify, in light of all circumstances, whether the issuing authority acted independently and whether the decision to issue the European Arrest Warrant was subject to substantive prior judicial review and appeal.
- Legal Topics
- European Arrest Warrant, Judicial Independence, Mutual Recognition, Procedural Safeguards
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
NJ
Subject of European Arrest Warrant
Parquet de Vienne
Issuing Authority (austria)
Generalstaatsanwaltschaft Berlin
Requesting Authority (germany)
Procedural Posture
Preliminary Ruling (urgent Procedure) / Opinion of Advocate General
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a public prosecutor's office subject to executive instructions can validly issue a European Arrest Warrant if subject to prior judicial review
- 2 Interpretation of 'issuing judicial authority' under Article 6(1) of Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA
Ratio Decidendi
A system in which a public prosecutor, potentially subject to executive instructions, issues a European Arrest Warrant that is subject to prior and effective judicial review before taking effect, and where such review is open to appeal, can satisfy the requirements of independence and effective judicial protection under Article 6(1) of Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA, provided the review is substantive and not merely formal.
Court Disposition
Guidance to referring court: verify, in light of all circumstances, whether the issuing authority acted independently and whether the decision to issue the European Arrest Warrant was subject to substantive prior judicial review and appeal.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment