Bob-Dogi (Judgment) [2016] EUECJ C-241/15 (01 June 2016)
Article 8(1)(c) of Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA requires that a European arrest warrant be based on a national arrest warrant that is distinct from the European arrest warrant. If the European arrest warrant does not refer to a separate national arrest warrant and is not based on one, the executing judicial authority must refuse to give effect to it, as it does not satisfy the requirements of lawfulness under Article 8(1).
- Citation
- [2016] EUECJ C-241/15
- Parties
- Requested Person: Mr Niculaie Aurel Bob-Dogi; Issuing Judicial Authority: Mátészalkai járásbíróság (District Court, Mátészalka, Hungary); Executing Judicial Authority: Curtea de Apel Cluj (Appeal Court, Cluj, Romania)
- Jurisdiction
- European Union
- Judgment Date
- 01 June 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Preliminary Ruling (reference for Interpretation) / Judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union
- Outcome
- Reference for a preliminary ruling answered; interpretation of Article 8(1)(c) provided.
- Legal Topics
- European Arrest Warrant, Mutual Recognition, Extradition, Judicial Cooperation, Procedural Safeguards
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mr Niculaie Aurel Bob-Dogi
Requested Person
Mátészalkai járásbíróság (District Court, Mátészalka, Hungary)
Issuing Judicial Authority
Curtea de Apel Cluj (Appeal Court, Cluj, Romania)
Executing Judicial Authority
Procedural Posture
Preliminary Ruling (reference for Interpretation) / Judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Article 8(1)(c) of Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA requires a European arrest warrant to be based on a distinct national arrest warrant
- 2 Whether the absence of a national arrest warrant constitutes grounds for refusal to execute a European arrest warrant
Ratio Decidendi
Article 8(1)(c) of Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA requires that a European arrest warrant be based on a national arrest warrant that is distinct from the European arrest warrant. If the European arrest warrant does not refer to a separate national arrest warrant and is not based on one, the executing judicial authority must refuse to give effect to it, as it does not satisfy the requirements of lawfulness under Article 8(1).
Court Disposition
Reference for a preliminary ruling answered; interpretation of Article 8(1)(c) provided.
Orders
- Article 8(1)(c) of Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA is interpreted as requiring a national arrest warrant distinct from the European arrest warrant.
- Where a European arrest warrant is not based on a separate national arrest warrant, the executing judicial authority must refuse to give effect to it if, after seeking supplementary information, it concludes that no such national warrant exists.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment