SF (European arrest warrant) (Judgment) [2020] EUECJ C-314/18 (11 March 2020)
The issuing Member State must return the surrendered person as soon as the sentencing decision has become final, unless concrete grounds relating to the rights of defence or proper administration of justice require the person's presence for further procedural steps; adaptation of the sentence by the executing Member State is only permitted within the strict conditions of Article 8(2) of Framework Decision 2008/909.
- Citation
- [2020] EUECJ C-314/18
- Parties
- Requested Person: SF; Issuing Judicial Authority: Crown Court in Canterbury (United Kingdom); Executing Judicial Authority: Rechtbank Amsterdam (District Court, Amsterdam, Netherlands); Intervener: Netherlands Government
- Jurisdiction
- European Union
- Judgment Date
- 11 March 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Preliminary Ruling / Judgment
- Outcome
- request for preliminary ruling admissible; interpretation provided
- Legal Topics
- European Arrest Warrant, Mutual Recognition, Extradition, Enforcement of Custodial Sentences, Adaptation of Sentences
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
SF
Requested Person
Crown Court in Canterbury (United Kingdom)
Issuing Judicial Authority
Rechtbank Amsterdam (District Court, Amsterdam, Netherlands)
Executing Judicial Authority
Netherlands Government
Intervener
Procedural Posture
Preliminary Ruling / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Timing of return of surrendered person under Article 5(3) of Framework Decision 2002/584
- 2 Adaptation of custodial sentence by executing Member State under Article 25 and Article 8(2) of Framework Decision 2008/909
Ratio Decidendi
The issuing Member State must return the surrendered person as soon as the sentencing decision has become final, unless concrete grounds relating to the rights of defence or proper administration of justice require the person's presence for further procedural steps; adaptation of the sentence by the executing Member State is only permitted within the strict conditions of Article 8(2) of Framework Decision 2008/909.
Court Disposition
request for preliminary ruling admissible; interpretation provided
Orders
- Issuing Member State must return person as soon as sentencing decision is final unless concrete grounds require presence for further proceedings.
- Executing Member State may adapt sentence only within strict conditions of Article 8(2) of Framework Decision 2008/909.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment