Criminal proceedings against Vincent Auer. [1979] EUECJ R-136/78 (7 February 1979)
Article 52 of the EEC Treaty does not entitle nationals of a Member State, prior to the implementation of Council Directives 78/1026 and 78/1027, to practise as veterinary surgeons in that Member State under conditions other than those laid down by national legislation.
- Citation
- [1979] EUECJ R-136/78
- Parties
- Prosecutor: Ministère Public; Accused: Vincent Auer; Civil Party: L'Ordre National des Vétérinaires de France; Civil Party: Le Syndicat National des Vétérinaires
- Jurisdiction
- European Union
- Judgment Date
- 07 February 1979
- Procedural Posture
- Reference for a Preliminary Ruling (article 177 EEC Treaty) / Preliminary Ruling
- Outcome
- Preliminary ruling issued; Article 52 does not override national requirements prior to implementation of Directives 78/1026 and 78/1027.
- Legal Topics
- Freedom of Establishment, Recognition of Qualifications, Veterinary Surgeons, Discrimination on Nationality Grounds
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ministère Public
Prosecutor
Vincent Auer
Accused
L'Ordre National des Vétérinaires de France
Civil Party
Le Syndicat National des Vétérinaires
Civil Party
Procedural Posture
Reference for a Preliminary Ruling (article 177 EEC Treaty) / Preliminary Ruling
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Article 52 EEC Treaty allows a national of a Member State to rely on freedom of establishment to practise as a veterinary surgeon in that state under conditions other than those laid down by national law, prior to implementation of Directives 78/1026 and 78/1027.
- 2 Whether the acquisition of nationality of the host Member State after obtaining qualifications in another Member State affects the right to rely on Article 52.
Ratio Decidendi
Article 52 of the EEC Treaty does not entitle nationals of a Member State, prior to the implementation of Council Directives 78/1026 and 78/1027, to practise as veterinary surgeons in that Member State under conditions other than those laid down by national legislation.
Court Disposition
Preliminary ruling issued; Article 52 does not override national requirements prior to implementation of Directives 78/1026 and 78/1027.
Orders
- Article 52 of the Treaty must be interpreted as meaning that for the period prior to the date on which the Member States are required to have taken the measures necessary to comply with Council Directives Nos 78/1026 and 78/1027 of 18 December 1978, the nationals of a Member State cannot rely on that provision with...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment