SIDE BY SIDE INTERNATIONAL FILM FESTIVAL AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA - 32678/18 (Positive obligations - Freedom of expression - Authorities' years-long failure to secure safe and uninterrupted conduct of annual international LGBT film festival organised by the applicant company - Remainder inadmissible : Third Section) [2024] ECHR 903 (17 December 2024)

SIDE BY SIDE INTERNATIONAL FILM FESTIVAL AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA - 32678/18 (Positive obligations - Freedom of expression - Authorities' years-long failure to secure safe and uninterrupted conduct of annual international LGBT film festival organised by the applicant company - Remainder inadmissible : Third Section) [2024] ECHR 903 (17 December 2024)

The State failed to discharge its positive obligations under Article 10 by not taking comprehensive and effective action to prevent repeated disruptions of the LGBT film festival, including bomb threats and false alarms, resulting in a violation of the applicant company's freedom of expression.

Citation
[2024] ECHR 903
Parties
Applicant Company: Side by Side International Film Festival OOO; Second Applicant: Gulnara Sultanova; Third Applicant: Andrey Petrov; Respondent Government: Russian Federation
Jurisdiction
European Union
Judgment Date
17 December 2024
Procedural Posture
Application to the European Court of Human Rights / Judgment After Full Hearing
Outcome
Violation of Article 10 found; complaint under Article 10 by applicant company admissible; complaints by second and third applicants inadmissible; no need to examine Article 14 separately; just satisfaction awarded.
Legal Topics
Freedom of Expression, Positive Obligations, Discrimination, LGBT Rights, Police Inaction, Public Safety, COVID 19 Restrictions

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 26 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Side by Side International Film Festival OOO

Applicant Company

Gulnara Sultanova

Second Applicant

Andrey Petrov

Third Applicant

Russian Federation

Respondent Government

Procedural Posture

Application to the European Court of Human Rights / Judgment After Full Hearing

  1. 1 Whether the State failed to comply with its positive obligations under Article 10 to protect freedom of expression by not securing the safe and uninterrupted conduct of the LGBT film festival.
  2. 2 Whether the authorities' actions or inactions in response to repeated bomb threats and disruptions constituted a violation of Article 10.
  3. 3 Whether the suspension of the festival in 2020 under COVID-19 measures was justified and proportionate.

Ratio Decidendi

The State failed to discharge its positive obligations under Article 10 by not taking comprehensive and effective action to prevent repeated disruptions of the LGBT film festival, including bomb threats and false alarms, resulting in a violation of the applicant company's freedom of expression.

Court Disposition

Violation of Article 10 found; complaint under Article 10 by applicant company admissible; complaints by second and third applicants inadmissible; no need to examine Article 14 separately; just satisfaction awarded.

Orders

  • The respondent State is to pay the applicant company EUR 7,500 in respect of non-pecuniary damage, plus any tax that may be chargeable, within three months from the date the judgment becomes final, to be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable at the date of settlement.
  • From the expiry of three months until settlement, simple interest shall be payable on the above amount at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points.