Procureur de la Republique v Marie-Helene Ferey, nee Hericotte. [1985] EUECJ R-215/84 (25 September 1985)
National rules imposing minimum retail prices for fuel are not in themselves contrary to Articles 3(f), 5, 85, and 86 of the EEC Treaty, but are contrary to Article 30 if the minimum price is fixed solely on the basis of national ex-refinery prices linked to national cost prices, when European rates differ by more than 8%.
- Citation
- [1985] EUECJ R-215/84
- Parties
- Public Prosecutor: Procureur de la République; Civil Party: Syndicat National des Gerants Libres (SNGL); Civil Party: Chambre Syndicale Nationale du Commerce et de la Reparation Automobile (CSNCRA); Civil Party: Bernard Thomas; Civil Party: Jacques Bruneau; Civil Party: Michel Le Breton; Civil Party: Pierre Parent; Civil Party: Gerard Guillemin; Civil Party: Guy Loisellier; Civil Party: Eduard Szelag; Accused: Marie-Helene Ferey, née Hericotte; Defendant in Civil Proceedings: Société ERG
- Jurisdiction
- European Union
- Judgment Date
- 25 September 1985
- Procedural Posture
- Preliminary Ruling (reference for Interpretation) / Judgment on Preliminary Reference
- Outcome
- Preliminary ruling issued; national rules not per se prohibited except as specified under Article 30 EEC Treaty.
- Legal Topics
- Minimum Pricing, Fuel Price Regulation, Free Movement of Goods, Competition Rules, Interpretation of EEC Treaty
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Procureur de la République
Public Prosecutor
Syndicat National des Gerants Libres (SNGL)
Civil Party
Chambre Syndicale Nationale du Commerce et de la Reparation Automobile (CSNCRA)
Civil Party
Bernard Thomas
Civil Party
Jacques Bruneau
Civil Party
Michel Le Breton
Civil Party
Pierre Parent
Civil Party
Gerard Guillemin
Civil Party
Guy Loisellier
Civil Party
Eduard Szelag
Civil Party
Marie-Helene Ferey, née Hericotte
Accused
Société ERG
Defendant in Civil Proceedings
Procedural Posture
Preliminary Ruling (reference for Interpretation) / Judgment on Preliminary Reference
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether national rules imposing minimum retail prices for fuel are compatible with Articles 3(f), 5, 30, 85, and 86 of the EEC Treaty
Ratio Decidendi
National rules imposing minimum retail prices for fuel are not in themselves contrary to Articles 3(f), 5, 85, and 86 of the EEC Treaty, but are contrary to Article 30 if the minimum price is fixed solely on the basis of national ex-refinery prices linked to national cost prices, when European rates differ by more than 8%.
Court Disposition
Preliminary ruling issued; national rules not per se prohibited except as specified under Article 30 EEC Treaty.
Orders
- Articles 3(f), 5, 85, and 86 EEC Treaty do not prohibit national rules providing for a minimum price for retail sale of fuel.
- Article 30 EEC Treaty prohibits such rules where the minimum price is fixed solely on the basis of ex-refinery prices of national refineries, linked to ceiling prices based solely on national cost prices, when European fuel rates are more than 8% above or below those prices.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment