Fresh Del Monte Produce v Commission (Judgment) [2015] EUECJ C-293/13 (24 June 2015)
The Court found that the General Court did not err in law in holding that Del Monte and Weichert formed an economic unit and that Del Monte exercised decisive influence over Weichert during the infringement period. The evidence supported the finding of joint and several liability for the competition law infringement. The Court also found no distortion of evidence or reversal of the burden of proof by the General Court. The right against self-incrimination did not apply to the simple requests for information at issue. The reduction of the fine by the General Court was upheld.
- Citation
- [2015] EUECJ C-293/13
- Parties
- Appellant (case C 293/13 P), Cross Appellant (case C 294/13 P): Fresh Del Monte Produce Inc.; Cross Appellant (case C 293/13 P and C 294/13 P): Internationale Fruchtimport Gesellschaft Weichert GmbH & Co. KG; Appellant (case C 294/13 P), Respondent: European Commission
- Jurisdiction
- European Union
- Judgment Date
- 24 June 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Joined Appeals and Cross Appeals From the General Court of the European Union / Judgment on Appeal by the Court of Justice of the European Union
- Outcome
- Appeals and cross-appeals dismissed or declared inadmissible as appropriate; General Court judgment upheld.
- Legal Topics
- Parent Subsidiary Liability, Concerted Practices, Right Against Self Incrimination, Leniency in Cartel Cases, Burden of Proof, Economic Unit Doctrine
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Fresh Del Monte Produce Inc.
Appellant (case C 293/13 P), Cross Appellant (case C 294/13 P)
Internationale Fruchtimport Gesellschaft Weichert GmbH & Co. KG
Cross Appellant (case C 293/13 P and C 294/13 P)
European Commission
Appellant (case C 294/13 P), Respondent
Procedural Posture
Joined Appeals and Cross Appeals From the General Court of the European Union / Judgment on Appeal by the Court of Justice of the European Union
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Del Monte and Weichert formed an economic unit for the purposes of imputing liability for competition law infringement
- 2 Whether the General Court distorted the evidence or misapplied the burden of proof regarding decisive influence
- 3 Whether the right against self-incrimination applies to responses to simple requests for information under Regulation No 1/2003
Ratio Decidendi
The Court found that the General Court did not err in law in holding that Del Monte and Weichert formed an economic unit and that Del Monte exercised decisive influence over Weichert during the infringement period. The evidence supported the finding of joint and several liability for the competition law infringement. The Court also found no distortion of evidence or reversal of the burden of proof by the General Court. The right against self-incrimination did not apply to the simple requests for information at issue. The reduction of the fine by the General Court was upheld.
Court Disposition
Appeals and cross-appeals dismissed or declared inadmissible as appropriate; General Court judgment upheld.
Orders
- Weichert's cross-appeal in Case C-293/13 P dismissed as inadmissible.
- Del Monte's appeal in Case C-293/13 P dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment