Vladimir Mikhaylovich YUSHCHENKO and Others v Ukraine - 73990/01 [2007] ECHR 309 (27 March 2007)

Vladimir Mikhaylovich YUSHCHENKO and Others v Ukraine - 73990/01 [2007] ECHR 309 (27 March 2007)

The Court cannot determine admissibility of certain complaints based on the case file and adjourns examination of those complaints; remainder of complaints are manifestly ill-founded and inadmissible.

Citation
[2007] ECHR 309
Parties
First Applicant: Vladimir Mikhaylovich Yushchenko; Second Applicant: Vladimir Vladimirovich Yushchenko; Third Applicant: Pavel Vladimirovich Yushchenko; Applicant Company: YUVM-Avtoservis; Respondent Government: Ukraine
Jurisdiction
European Union
Judgment Date
27 March 2007
Procedural Posture
European Court of Human Rights Application / Partial Decision as to Admissibility
Outcome
Partial admissibility; remainder inadmissible
Legal Topics
Right to Fair Trial, Presumption of Innocence, Property Rights, Length of Proceedings, Access to Court, Compensation for Unlawful Actions, Enforcement of Judgments
Human Rights Civil Procedure Criminal Procedure Property Law Administrative Law Right to Fair Trial Presumption of Innocence Property Rights +4 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 14
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Vladimir Mikhaylovich Yushchenko

First Applicant

Vladimir Vladimirovich Yushchenko

Second Applicant

Pavel Vladimirovich Yushchenko

Third Applicant

YUVM-Avtoservis

Applicant Company

Ukraine

Respondent Government

Procedural Posture

European Court of Human Rights Application / Partial Decision as to Admissibility

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the applicants' rights under Article 6 §§ 1 and 2 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 were violated in civil and criminal proceedings
  2. 2 Whether the length of proceedings and fairness of hearings met Convention standards
  3. 3 Whether property rights were violated during enforcement of judgments

Ratio Decidendi

The Court cannot determine admissibility of certain complaints based on the case file and adjourns examination of those complaints; remainder of complaints are manifestly ill-founded and inadmissible.

Court Disposition

Partial admissibility; remainder inadmissible

Orders

  • Applications joined
  • Examination of specified complaints adjourned