A.M.O. v Denmark - 34036/11 [2012] ECHR 919 (22 May 2012)

A.M.O. v Denmark - 34036/11 [2012] ECHR 919 (22 May 2012)

The Court found the friendly settlement to be based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and its Protocols and saw no reasons to continue examination of the application.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2012] ECHR 919
Parties
Applicant: A. M. O.; Respondent: Danish Government
Jurisdiction
European Union
Judgment Date
22 May 2012
Procedural Posture
Application / Friendly Settlement, Decision to Strike Out
Outcome
Application struck out following friendly settlement.
Legal Topics
Asylum, Dublin Regulation, Article 3 ECHR, Article 13 ECHR, Friendly Settlement
Human Rights Law Immigration Law Asylum Dublin Regulation Article 3 ECHR Article 13 ECHR Friendly Settlement

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

A. M. O.

Applicant

Danish Government

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Application / Friendly Settlement, Decision to Strike Out

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the return of the applicant to Greece by Denmark violated Articles 3 and 13 of the European Convention on Human Rights.

Ratio Decidendi

The Court found the friendly settlement to be based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and its Protocols and saw no reasons to continue examination of the application.

Court Disposition

Application struck out following friendly settlement.

Orders

  • The Government must pay the applicant DKK 185,000 within three months as compensation for non-pecuniary damage.
  • In case of late payment, simple interest at the ECB marginal lending rate plus three percentage points is payable.