ROBOTA AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE - 7158/04 - HEJUD [2013] ECHR 59 (17 January 2013)

ROBOTA AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE - 7158/04 - HEJUD [2013] ECHR 59 (17 January 2013)

The Court found that the authorities' failure to enforce domestic decisions in the applicants' favour for lengthy periods constituted violations of Article 6 § 1 and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1, and that the lack of effective domestic remedies for such non-enforcement constituted a violation of Article 13.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2013] ECHR 59
Parties
Applicant: Anna Ilyinichna Robota and 89 other Ukrainian nationals and companies; Respondent: Ukraine
Jurisdiction
European Union
Procedural Posture
Application Under Article 34 ECHR / Judgment After Resumption of Proceedings and Rejection of Unilateral Declarations
Outcome
Applications joined; violations of Article 6 § 1, Article 13, and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 found; just satisfaction awarded.
Legal Topics
Non Enforcement of Domestic Judgments, Right to a Fair Trial, Right to an Effective Remedy, Peaceful Enjoyment of Possessions
Human Rights Law Civil Procedure Non Enforcement of Domestic Judgments Right to a Fair Trial Right to an Effective Remedy Peaceful Enjoyment of Possessions

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Anna Ilyinichna Robota and 89 other Ukrainian nationals and companies

Applicant

Ukraine

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Application Under Article 34 ECHR / Judgment After Resumption of Proceedings and Rejection of Unilateral Declarations

  1. 1 Whether the prolonged non-enforcement of domestic decisions in applicants' favour violated Article 6 § 1 and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 of the Convention
  2. 2 Whether the lack of effective domestic remedies for such non-enforcement violated Article 13 of the Convention

Ratio Decidendi

The Court found that the authorities' failure to enforce domestic decisions in the applicants' favour for lengthy periods constituted violations of Article 6 § 1 and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1, and that the lack of effective domestic remedies for such non-enforcement constituted a violation of Article 13.

Court Disposition

Applications joined; violations of Article 6 § 1, Article 13, and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 found; just satisfaction awarded.

Orders

  • Join the applications.
  • Declare complaints under Article 6 § 1, Article 13, and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 admissible; remainder inadmissible.