ARMANDO GRASSO v. ITALY (Revision) - 48411/99 [2003] ECHR 202 (29 April 2003)
The Court found that the conditions for revision were not met, as no new decisive facts had been presented.
- Citation
- [2003] ECHR 202
- Parties
- Applicant: Armando Grasso; Respondent: Italy
- Jurisdiction
- European Union
- Judgment Date
- 29 April 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Revision of Judgment / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- application for revision dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Revision of Judgment, Right to a Fair Trial
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Parties
Armando Grasso
Applicant
Italy
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Application for Revision of Judgment / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the conditions for revision of a previous judgment are met under the European Convention on Human Rights
Ratio Decidendi
The Court found that the conditions for revision were not met, as no new decisive facts had been presented.
Court Disposition
application for revision dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment