Astir A.E. v Elliniko Dimosio. [1997] EUECJ C-109/95 (13 March 1997)
A trader is not entitled to an export refund where the product perished in transit due to force majeure after leaving the Community, and the same rate of refund was fixed for all non-member countries except one, for which no refund was fixed; this constitutes a variable refund, requiring proof of importation.
- Citation
- [1997] EUECJ C-109/95
- Parties
- Applicant: Astir AE; Respondent: Hellenic Republic
- Jurisdiction
- European Union
- Judgment Date
- 13 March 1997
- Procedural Posture
- Preliminary Reference / Preliminary Ruling
- Outcome
- Application for export refund denied
- Legal Topics
- Export Refunds, Force Majeure, Interpretation of Commission Regulation (eec) No 2730/79
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Astir AE
Applicant
Hellenic Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Preliminary Reference / Preliminary Ruling
Legal Issues
- 1 Entitlement to export refund when product perishes in transit due to force majeure and refund not fixed for one non-member country
Ratio Decidendi
A trader is not entitled to an export refund where the product perished in transit due to force majeure after leaving the Community, and the same rate of refund was fixed for all non-member countries except one, for which no refund was fixed; this constitutes a variable refund, requiring proof of importation.
Court Disposition
Application for export refund denied
Orders
- Trader not entitled to export refund under Articles 10(4), 20 and 21 of Regulation No 2730/79 in circumstances described.
- Costs for Greek Government and Commission not recoverable; national court to decide costs for main parties.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment