Azemi v. Serbia (dec.) - 11209/09 - Legal Summary [2013] ECHR 1318 (05 November 2013)

Serbia did not exercise effective control over Kosovo after 10 June 1999 due to international administration, and the applicant's complaint was incompatible ratione temporis and ratione personae.

Source-derived case information.

Citation: [2013] ECHR 1318
Parties: Applicant: Azemi; Respondent: Serbia
Jurisdiction: European Union
Judgment Date: 05 November 2013
Procedural Posture: Application to European Court of Human Rights / Decision on Admissibility
Outcome: inadmissible
Legal Topics: State Responsibility, Non Enforcement of Judicial Decisions, Jurisdiction Ratione Temporis, Jurisdiction Ratione Personae

Human Rights Law International Law State Responsibility Non Enforcement of Judicial Decisions Jurisdiction Ratione Temporis Jurisdiction Ratione Personae

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2

Parties

Azemi

Applicant

Serbia

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Application to European Court of Human Rights / Decision on Admissibility

Legal Issues

1 Serbia's responsibility for non-enforcement of a Kosovo court decision
2 Jurisdiction ratione temporis and ratione personae under Article 1 of the Convention

Ratio Decidendi

Serbia did not exercise effective control over Kosovo after 10 June 1999 due to international administration, and the applicant's complaint was incompatible ratione temporis and ratione personae.

Court Disposition

inadmissible

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the case law currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

Source-derived facts are shown separately from AI-generated material. If an AI summary is available, it is explicitly labelled and remains a non-authoritative research aid.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.