B.A.S. v Denmark - 32936/10 [2012] ECHR 937 (22 May 2012)
The Court found the friendly settlement to be based on respect for human rights and saw no reason to continue examination of the application, thus striking it out of its list of cases.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2012] ECHR 937
- Parties
- Applicant: B. A. S.; Respondent: Danish Government
- Jurisdiction
- European Union
- Judgment Date
- 22 May 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Application / Decision on Friendly Settlement
- Outcome
- application struck out
- Legal Topics
- Asylum, Dublin Regulation, Article 3 ECHR, Article 13 ECHR, Friendly Settlement
Human Rights Law Immigration Law Asylum Dublin Regulation Article 3 ECHR Article 13 ECHR Friendly Settlement
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Parties
B. A. S.
Applicant
Danish Government
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Application / Decision on Friendly Settlement
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the return of the applicant to Greece by Denmark violated Articles 3 and 13 of the European Convention on Human Rights.
Ratio Decidendi
The Court found the friendly settlement to be based on respect for human rights and saw no reason to continue examination of the application, thus striking it out of its list of cases.
Court Disposition
application struck out
Orders
- The Government must pay the applicant DKK 185,000 within three months as compensation for non-pecuniary damage.
- In case of late payment, simple interest at the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank plus three percentage points is payable.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment