Ernst and others v Belgium - 33400/96 [2010] ECHR 938 (3 June 2010)
The searches were disproportionate to the legitimate aims pursued, inadequately justified, and excessively broad, resulting in violations of Articles 8 and 10 of the Convention.
- Citation
- [2010] ECHR 938
- Parties
- Applicants: Ernst and others; Respondent: Belgium
- Jurisdiction
- European Union
- Judgment Date
- 03 June 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Application to the European Court of Human Rights / Execution of Judgment; Post Final Judgment Compliance Review
- Outcome
- Case closed; Belgium complied with the judgment and adopted sufficient individual and general measures.
- Legal Topics
- Freedom of Expression, Right to Respect for Private and Family Life, Protection of Journalistic Sources, Search and Seizure
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ernst and others
Applicants
Belgium
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Application to the European Court of Human Rights / Execution of Judgment; Post Final Judgment Compliance Review
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether searches of journalists' homes and offices violated Article 10 (freedom of expression) and Article 8 (right to respect for home and private life) of the European Convention on Human Rights
Ratio Decidendi
The searches were disproportionate to the legitimate aims pursued, inadequately justified, and excessively broad, resulting in violations of Articles 8 and 10 of the Convention.
Court Disposition
Case closed; Belgium complied with the judgment and adopted sufficient individual and general measures.
Orders
- Payment of EUR 8,000 for non-pecuniary damage, EUR 9,000 for costs and expenses, totaling EUR 17,000 to applicants.
- Return or waiver of seized objects and documents; no further individual measures required.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment