3 cases against Romania - 19997/02 [2011] ECHR 1285 (8 June 2011)
The European Court found that the domestic courts' failure to provide sufficient reasoning for their decisions in insult and defamation cases violated the applicants' right to a fair trial under Article 6(1), and in two cases, also unjustifiably interfered with their freedom of expression under Article 10.
- Citation
- [2011] ECHR 1285
- Parties
- Applicant: Boldea; Applicant: Folea; Applicant: Rache and Ozon; Respondent: Romania
- Jurisdiction
- European Union
- Judgment Date
- 08 June 2011
- Procedural Posture
- European Court of Human Rights Judgment Execution / Post Judgment Supervision and Closure
- Outcome
- Supervision closed; Romania found to have complied with execution of judgments.
- Legal Topics
- Fair Trial, Freedom of Expression, Defamation, Insult, Criminal Procedure, Civil Damages
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Boldea
Applicant
Folea
Applicant
Rache and Ozon
Applicant
Romania
Respondent
Procedural Posture
European Court of Human Rights Judgment Execution / Post Judgment Supervision and Closure
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the lack of sufficient reasoning in domestic court judgments for insult and defamation violated Article 6(1) (right to a fair trial) and Article 10 (freedom of expression) of the European Convention on Human Rights.
Ratio Decidendi
The European Court found that the domestic courts' failure to provide sufficient reasoning for their decisions in insult and defamation cases violated the applicants' right to a fair trial under Article 6(1), and in two cases, also unjustifiably interfered with their freedom of expression under Article 10.
Court Disposition
Supervision closed; Romania found to have complied with execution of judgments.
Orders
- No further individual measures required for Boldea and Rache and Ozon.
- Individual measures in Folea fully remedied consequences of violations.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment