BPCE and Others v SRB (Contributions ex ante 2022) (Economic and monetary union - Banking union - Single Resolution Mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) - Judgment) French Text [2024] EUECJ T-393/22 (17 July 2024)
The SRB breached Article 70(2) of Regulation (EU) No 806/2014 by setting the 2022 ex ante contributions above the 12.5% cap of the forecast final target level. The cap applies during the initial period and is mandatory. This legal error alone justifies annulment of the decision as it concerns the applicants.
- Citation
- [2024] EUECJ T-393/22
- Parties
- Applicant: BPCE; Respondent: Conseil de résolution unique (CRU); Intervener: Parlement européen; Intervener: Conseil de l’Union européenne
- Jurisdiction
- European Union
- Judgment Date
- 17 July 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Annulment Action (article 263 Tfeu) / Judgment at First Instance
- Outcome
- Application granted in part; impugned decision annulled as regards applicants; effects maintained temporarily.
- Legal Topics
- Single Resolution Mechanism, Banking Union, Ex Ante Contributions, Regulation (eu) No 806/2014, Financial Stability, Administrative Law
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
BPCE
Applicant
Conseil de résolution unique (CRU)
Respondent
Parlement européen
Intervener
Conseil de l’Union européenne
Intervener
Procedural Posture
Annulment Action (article 263 Tfeu) / Judgment at First Instance
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the SRB exceeded the 12.5% annual cap on ex ante contributions under Article 70(2) of Regulation (EU) No 806/2014
- 2 Whether the annual cap applies during the initial period for building up the Single Resolution Fund
- 3 Interpretation of the interplay between Articles 69 and 70 of Regulation (EU) No 806/2014
Ratio Decidendi
The SRB breached Article 70(2) of Regulation (EU) No 806/2014 by setting the 2022 ex ante contributions above the 12.5% cap of the forecast final target level. The cap applies during the initial period and is mandatory. This legal error alone justifies annulment of the decision as it concerns the applicants.
Court Disposition
Application granted in part; impugned decision annulled as regards applicants; effects maintained temporarily.
Orders
- The SRB/ES/2022/18 decision is annulled as it concerns BPCE and other applicants.
- Effects of the decision are maintained for up to six months from the judgment becoming final or until replaced.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment